From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: systemd and /etc/machine-id
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 17:15:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488730523.7785.290.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP71WjxRGB3L=iKN+LK2JTdO51oy10Vua-sg46E6MvOu+B52fQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 10:40 +0100, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am trying to understand why the systemd recipe creates an
> empty /etc/machine-id file:
>
> # Create machine-id
>
> # 20:12 < mezcalero> koen: you have three options: a) run
> systemd-machine-id-setup at install time, b) have / read-only and an
> empty file there (for stateless) and c) boot with / writable
> touch ${D}${sysconfdir}/machine-id
It's probably done for case b, the read-only rootfs (both when never
mounted read/write and when initially read-only until fsck completes).
systemd mounts a temporary machine-id over the empty file while the
rootfs is read-only. This is definitely needed for the permanently
read-only rootfs, because several services (for example, journald, if I
remember correctly) do not run without a valid machine-id.
I'm not 100% sure whether the "read-only initially" case also needs the
file. If not, then perhaps it can be limited to images with "read-only"
in IMAGE_FEATURES?
> Having an empty machine-id file seems to prevent the
> "ConditionFirstBoot" to be ever met, e.g. I have a service that tries
> to use it, and at first boot i am seeing in systemctl status:
>
> ConditionFirstBoot=yes was not met
When the rootfs is read-only permanently, does this condition still make
sense? Probably not, because each boot would be considered a "first
boot". Just wondering how this condition could be handled better.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-05 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-05 9:40 systemd and /etc/machine-id Nicolas Dechesne
2017-03-05 16:15 ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1488730523.7785.290.camel@intel.com \
--to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
--cc=nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.