From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755309AbdCGMCc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:02:32 -0500
Received: from smtprelay0214.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.214]:43526 "EHLO
        smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754599AbdCGMCP (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:02:15 -0500
X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D
X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1566:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3866:3867:3870:3871:3873:4321:5007:6742:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:14659:21080:30054:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none
X-HE-Tag: knot96_1167895f08415
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1642
Message-ID: <1488888118.2210.28.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, kbuild-all@01.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, tipbuild@zytor.com,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 04:01:58 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20170307090144.GB6946@gmail.com>
References: <201703060848.Q2LHSMc4%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
         <20170306004553.GA25764@lkp-wsm-ep1> <20170307072322.GB29708@gmail.com>
         <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703070924220.3584@nanos>
         <20170307090144.GB6946@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.3-0ubuntu0.1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 10:01 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> To me a lexical 'true/false' instead of '1/0' is a step backwards in readability 
> in many cases

What cases are those to you?

I can't think of any case where 1/0 for true/false
is "more readable" for boolean returns to me.