diff for duplicates of <1489373088.5841.15.camel@intel.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 87ce892..cf9686b 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 23:43 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
 > > to cpufreq_register_notifier() and cpufreq_unregister_notifier().
 > > Since cooling_list_lock is also used within
 > > cpufreq_thermal_notifier(),
-> > lockdep reports a potential deadlock.  I don't think that's
+> > lockdep reports a potential deadlock.??I don't think that's
 > > actually
 > > possible, but it's easy enough to make it impossible by testing the
 > > condition under cooling_list_lock and dropping the lock before
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 23:43 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
 > > registered,
 > > and we know that anyway because we know whether the list
 > > transitioned
-> > between empty and not-empty.  So we can delete that variable too.
+> > between empty and not-empty.??So we can delete that variable too.
 > > 
 > > Fixes: ae606089621ef0349402cfcbeca33a82abbd0fd0
 > > Reported-by: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
@@ -41,8 +41,3 @@ patch applied.
 
 thanks,
 rui
-
-_______________________________________________
-linux-arm-kernel mailing list
-linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 7ec9257..6349783 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,16 +3,10 @@
  "ref\0BY2PR21MB00362E60448FD2E00C120FFCCB200@BY2PR21MB0036.namprd21.prod.outlook.com\0"
  "ref\0BY2PR21MB00361C512E03B09DBCE715D3CB200@BY2PR21MB0036.namprd21.prod.outlook.com\0"
  "ref\020170310234325.GB21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk\0"
- "From\0Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [BUG] v4.11-rc1: CPUFREQ Circular locking dependency\0"
+ "From\0rui.zhang@intel.com (Zhang Rui)\0"
+ "Subject\0[BUG] v4.11-rc1: CPUFREQ Circular locking dependency\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:44:48 +0800\0"
- "To\0Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>"
- " Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>\0"
- "Cc\0Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>"
-  Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
-  Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
- " Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "\n"
@@ -31,7 +25,7 @@
  "> > to cpufreq_register_notifier() and cpufreq_unregister_notifier().\n"
  "> > Since cooling_list_lock is also used within\n"
  "> > cpufreq_thermal_notifier(),\n"
- "> > lockdep reports a potential deadlock.\302\240\302\240I don't think that's\n"
+ "> > lockdep reports a potential deadlock.??I don't think that's\n"
  "> > actually\n"
  "> > possible, but it's easy enough to make it impossible by testing the\n"
  "> > condition under cooling_list_lock and dropping the lock before\n"
@@ -44,7 +38,7 @@
  "> > registered,\n"
  "> > and we know that anyway because we know whether the list\n"
  "> > transitioned\n"
- "> > between empty and not-empty.\302\240\302\240So we can delete that variable too.\n"
+ "> > between empty and not-empty.??So we can delete that variable too.\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > Fixes: ae606089621ef0349402cfcbeca33a82abbd0fd0\n"
  "> > Reported-by: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>\n"
@@ -57,11 +51,6 @@
  "patch applied.\n"
  "\n"
  "thanks,\n"
- "rui\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
+ rui
 
-92bbdd36c895b6a2ad00244d3c52807b8a101affc4cfdd0b861242ad14100490
+779c073eb7d142c84e39464d573a6d34fca0ee095e86d2902977e1c69a3efaa5
