From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36B4719DC for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z13so20086353iof.2 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 06:39:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RTzgiCvP01BEMw6yYuAY0jSN9loBc3SrT1BOHhmA0DI=; b=Lyq1OMLjyYmyFSo/Ld5Lc46dwgNVTZdDt+MQVp25T7cU9RYrIqQo/XwEnYTZDk4k2z /auawMdlwIZNVJFRQXH+wDAtWlo+0UoZCCYcjJvo5s81GlxkbC71zeaDM+EtBRKFp3Ac Iwc2oUC95phwIaFqB8jPxaEumnqjiOrZBQEd5CSrE7lGdKQ0v2gZAYUmZGlA9UcCr8W7 M1RODx3JDuu1gcd6/8LFXO/MmjHSmdcR2EFoIu91HkHuQOfb0k/LD43CicTBTrXL19fw USd7YoEaUBd7ybNSbzbi0thpAZTBcAV5vNuDq+M9bpGlrKWGHN7SB0KtkmFyxyHoCiNE +PgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RTzgiCvP01BEMw6yYuAY0jSN9loBc3SrT1BOHhmA0DI=; b=i5zJWduxgRpR0uzBTAO56kQEUtfHp3B1mVmU+9oe6D1y7xCr7pis/zhmBr7wCpWhfc Wj8xBKHej3vZIevrfLMqHUFeP/LFhOyqWpQUNePxSm8aFX/fURv3yn8WHMmvmRw0qH22 gT14HMd9i1TMgpxs3cZ8m7E2h94N7X+byP5kjI0Sf53MH/0egmoW/GGqiB7FVbR1TF7X LIJSO/eG0QVnmv2EkreUbjqcHwvx7TidGO4Z966jMKUwbg+PGt1eFVVpkwP88JKv4XTV dQI/0HJcZM0o9YnHnZrjHB6ovwODZgNnhjgUYaI4FVHDMJGjuB+LhKFahgKlbVBg6jCP vccw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3aqLqf3WzuLeAMFzZeLIpvHWsBKh4k9/cOxyY81OYQyTQLe6d6j1m5pwG5xMfe7nP4 X-Received: by 10.107.12.215 with SMTP id 84mr4876654iom.89.1489585164398; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 06:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DCEB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.220.235]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d12sm1492926iog.53.2017.03.15.06.39.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 06:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1489585158.6396.102.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:39:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170315125810.GA28986@linux.intel.com> References: <2791e915-9e22-a01a-ccb5-c629d250edb2@phytec.de> <20170308105729.GA22401@linux.intel.com> <7d4a770f-25c6-5747-5a5c-370c822f2efb@mlbassoc.com> <20170308134349.GA16099@linux.intel.com> <20170314171147.GA28498@linux.intel.com> <1489513785.6396.83.camel@intel.com> <20170314180644.GA22000@linux.intel.com> <1489562674.6396.89.camel@intel.com> <20170315125810.GA28986@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Gary Thomas , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Create more than one image with WIC X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:39:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:58 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote: > Regarding do_rm_work. It should not touch rootfs directories, I believe. It does, and it should by default because a rootfs can be quite large. If it's not going to be reused in another recipe, then it is worthwhile to remove it. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.