From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <1489835909.5861.21.camel@gmx.de>
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 12:18:29 +0100
In-Reply-To: <d0f21b27-4070-91b3-60ac-b596673ba311@web.de>
References: <1489817372.4278.44.camel@gmx.de>
 <d0f21b27-4070-91b3-60ac-b596673ba311@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] ipipe + PREEMPT_RT
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
 <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
 <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, xenomai@xenomai.org

On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 09:45 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:

> Was your question just out or curiosity, or is there a potential use case?

Yeah, curiosity, thinking of possibilities.  I saw the PREEMPT_RT bits.
and was pondering the prospect of having a co-kernel available in big
boxen for large RT loads having a subset with very tight constraints.

	-Mike