diff for duplicates of <1490109496.17719.15.camel@linux.intel.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index e7b699c..76f5ff7 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 10:07 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: ->A +> > > > the main problem is that kworkers will not belong to the same cpu group > > > and so they will not be throttled properly. > > You do have a point that this page freeing activities should strive to > > affect other threads not in the same cgroup minimally. > > -> > On the other hand, we also don't do this throttling of kworkersA +> > On the other hand, we also don't do this throttling of kworkers > > today (e.g. pdflush) according to the cgroup it is doing work for. > Yes, I am not saying this a new problem. I just wanted to point out that > this is something to consider here. I believe this should be fixable. @@ -14,14 +14,8 @@ On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 10:07 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > be checked). Instead of attaching the kworders to the cgroup of the initiator, I -wonder what people think about creating a separate kworker cgroup.A +wonder what people think about creating a separate kworker cgroup. The administrator can set limit on its cpu resource bandwidth if he/she does not want such kworkers perturbing the system. Tim - --- -To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in -the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, -see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . -Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 1645b18..08e097f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 10:07 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:\n" - ">A \n" + ">\302\240\n" "> > > the main problem is that kworkers will not belong to the same cpu group\n" "> > > and so they will not be throttled properly.\n" "> > You do have a point that this page freeing activities should strive to\n" "> > affect other threads not in the same cgroup minimally.\n" "> > \n" - "> > On the other hand, we also don't do this throttling of kworkersA \n" + "> > On the other hand, we also don't do this throttling of kworkers\302\240\n" "> > today (e.g. pdflush) according to the cgroup it is doing work for.\n" "> Yes, I am not saying this a new problem. I just wanted to point out that\n" "> this is something to consider here. I believe this should be fixable.\n" @@ -33,16 +33,10 @@ "> be checked).\n" "\n" "Instead of attaching the kworders to the cgroup of the initiator, I\n" - "wonder what people think about creating a separate kworker cgroup.A \n" + "wonder what people think about creating a separate kworker cgroup.\302\240\n" "The administrator can set limit on its cpu resource bandwidth\n" "if he/she does not want such kworkers perturbing the system.\n" "\n" - "Tim\n" - "\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n" - "the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,\n" - "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n" - "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>" + Tim -1761cba4acf119c30683c957824f4788892a69b4627613b2d8d364ed72b38899 +6b88ded5495dd2e7c2ebf9b15ee7a8bc5659f7beb06531c5ad647c29f468db54
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.