From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 25B9CE00A0A; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:29:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [134.134.136.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB67E009B2 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:29:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=intel; t=1490113779; x=1521649779; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QlCzWMz+3qM7reVgMbjKUD4NTlr7z5DkWDuqhAHYQ70=; b=iIW74mfDi4ZvhEzx025YWO03cI8wtnFqAKUrjpKPxlldUT+3PW7rkIkG a8AsYgtksBKCNdDVhvDEE6L4y8j09w==; Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Mar 2017 09:29:30 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,200,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="79474772" Received: from lsandov1-mobl2.zpn.intel.com ([10.219.128.141]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2017 09:29:29 -0700 Message-ID: <1490114241.3261.173.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Leonardo Sandoval To: Matthew Stanger Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:37:21 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <4fe5a241-b774-aef8-da55-6fae5d4285fb@mlbassoc.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Gary Thomas Subject: Re: Bumping all packages versions X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:29:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit have you tried the 'bitbake-layes show-recipes' script? that scripts list the recipes, layer it belongs and the recipe's PV, unfortunately not in a single line, but data is there. Leo On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 11:35 -0600, Matthew Stanger wrote: > No.... Thanks I'm a rookie :) > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Gary Thomas > wrote: > On 2017-03-20 16:52, Matthew Stanger wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running Yocto 1.7.1 and was wondering if there was > a simple way to roll/bump all package versions. For > example in > every .bb I want to bump PV = $version higher. I'm > trying to do this as we've designed our headless > system to update > using opkg but now we are struggling to find a simple > way to update package versions, we're trying to stay > away from > manually doing it as there is a lot of room for error > when touching so many packages. First, is there a way > to brute > force bump all package versions and 2nd is there a way > to only bump packages that have changed code (like > auto git hash > diff or something) without manually bumping the PV > version in the .bb? What is the proper way to handle > you distro's > versioning at the package level? > > Are you using the PR server? That's pretty much what it's > for. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > >