From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
To: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:33:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490204011.25640.1.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490138651.13532.11.camel@dk-H97M-D3H>
Em Ter, 2017-03-21 às 23:05 +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran escreveu:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 18:57 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >
> > Because {hsw,skl,bxt}_ddi_pll_select all pretty much do the same
> > thing
> > in slightly different ways. Replace everything with a simple copy
> > of
> > the function and inline it inside intle_ddi_pll_select().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 58 +++++-----------------------
> > ------------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index d8214ba..bd6fd0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -1127,47 +1127,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct
> > intel_encoder *encoder,
> > bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool
> > -hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > -{
> > - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> > -
> > - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
>
> I have a related question, not a patch review :) Looks like we care
> only
> about the boolean returned from intel_get_shared_dpll(). Could not
> find
> any caller that uses the returned 'struct intel_shared_dpll *'.
> Should
> it's signature be simply changed to return a bool?
There are only two callers. It would be possible to change the
signature, although I don't see many benefits from doing it now.
Perhaps it would be better to unify the error handling.
>
> -DK
> >
> > - if (!pll)
> > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > %c\n",
> > - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > -
> > - return pll;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static bool
> > -skl_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > -{
> > - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> > -
> > - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > encoder);
> > - if (pll == NULL) {
> > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > %c\n",
> > - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > - return false;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return true;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static bool
> > -bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > -{
> > - return !!intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > encoder);
> > -}
> > -
> > /*
> > * Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
> > * intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel.
> > @@ -1178,19 +1137,16 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc
> > *intel_crtc,
> > bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > {
> > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc-
> > >base.dev);
> > struct intel_encoder *encoder =
> > intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
> > + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> >
> > - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> > - return skl_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
> > - else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> > - return bxt_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
> > - else
> > - return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
> > + pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > encoder);
> > + if (!pll)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > %c\n",
> > + pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > +
> > + return pll;
> > }
> >
> > void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 21:57 [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select() Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-21 22:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-03-21 23:05 ` [PATCH] " Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-03-22 17:33 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2017-03-22 13:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-03-22 17:40 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 17:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-03-22 18:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 18:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: kill intel_ddi_pll_select() Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 19:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1490204011.25640.1.camel@intel.com \
--to=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.