From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: ✗ patchtest: failure for #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:36:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490287004.28281.86.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6135390.NMCEsh2eSl@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 15:57 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Thursday, 23 March 2017 9:53:31 AM NZDT Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part)
> > Revision: 1
> > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/5923/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> >
> > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
> > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
> > series by patchtest resulting in the following results:
> >
> >
> >
> > * Issue [pretest_src_uri_checksums_not_changed]
> >
> > * Issue No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > [pretest_src_uri_left_files]
> >
> > * Issue No added or modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > [pretest_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned]
> >
> > * Issue [pretest_pylint]
> >
> > * Issue [test_max_line_length]
> >
> > * Issue [test_cve_presence_in_commit_message]
> >
> > * Issue [test_cve_tag_format]
> >
> > * Issue [test_shortlog_format]
> >
> > * Issue [test_shortlog_length]
> >
> > * Issue [test_summary_presence]
> >
> > * Issue [test_upstream_status_format]
> >
> > * Issue There are no new software patches, no reason to test
> > Upstream-Status presence [test_upstream_status_presence]
> >
> > * Issue Until general agreement with the community, disabling it
> > [test_commit_message_presence]
> >
> > * Issue [test_mbox_format]
> >
> > * Issue [test_series_merge_on_head]
> >
> > * Issue [test_src_uri_checksums_not_changed]
> >
> > * Issue No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > [test_src_uri_left_files]
> >
> > * Issue [test_bugzilla_entry_format]
> >
> > * Issue [test_signed_off_by_presence]
> >
> > * Issue There are no new software patches, no reason to test
> > Signed-off-by presence [test_signed_off_by_presence]
> >
> > * Issue Series merged, no reason to check other mailing lists
> > [test_target_mailing_list]
> >
> > * Issue No modified or added recipes, skipping test
> > [test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned]
> >
> > * Issue No added recipes, skipping test
> > [test_lic_files_chksum_presence]
> >
> > * Issue [test_pylint]
> >
> > * Issue [test_author_valid]
>
> These results look a bit broken - some are skipped and really shouldn't be
> showing at all. Was the script invoked in a different way to normal?
>
Yes, it was invoked in a different way (there was not filtering on
failures). From now on, we should be getting emails just with test
failures.
Leo
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> --
>
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 13:42 [PATCH 00/10] #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part) Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 01/10] wic: remove rootfs_pcbios_ext plugin Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 02/10] wic: don't set creator.bootimg_dir in plugins Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 03/10] wic: use kernel_dir instead of bootimg_dir Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 04/10] wic: fix bug in sparse_copy Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 05/10] wic: use STAGING_DATADIR as a default for bootimg_dir Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 06/10] wic: remove empty plugin methods Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 07/10] wic: improve getting syslinux path Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 08/10] oe-selftest: test wic rawcopy plugin Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 09/10] selftest: pylinted wic test suite Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 10/10] oe-selftest: add test_rawcopy_plugin test case Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 20:53 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part) Patchwork
2017-03-23 2:57 ` Paul Eggleton
2017-03-23 16:35 ` Leonardo Sandoval
2017-03-23 16:36 ` Leonardo Sandoval [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1490287004.28281.86.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.