All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: shli@fb.com, colyli@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com, neilb@suse.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "md/raid1/10: fix potential deadlock" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:03:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14903677918123@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    md/raid1/10: fix potential deadlock

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     md-raid1-10-fix-potential-deadlock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 61eb2b43b99ebdc9bc6bc83d9792257b243e7cb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:00:20 -0800
Subject: md/raid1/10: fix potential deadlock

From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

commit 61eb2b43b99ebdc9bc6bc83d9792257b243e7cb3 upstream.

Neil Brown pointed out a potential deadlock in raid 10 code with
bio_split/chain. The raid1 code could have the same issue, but recent
barrier rework makes it less likely to happen. The deadlock happens in
below sequence:

1. generic_make_request(bio), this will set current->bio_list
2. raid10_make_request will split bio to bio1 and bio2
3. __make_request(bio1), wait_barrer, add underlayer disk bio to
current->bio_list
4. __make_request(bio2), wait_barrer

If raise_barrier happens between 3 & 4, since wait_barrier runs at 3,
raise_barrier waits for IO completion from 3. And since raise_barrier
sets barrier, 4 waits for raise_barrier. But IO from 3 can't be
dispatched because raid10_make_request() doesn't finished yet.

The solution is to adjust the IO ordering. Quotes from Neil:
"
It is much safer to:

    if (need to split) {
        split = bio_split(bio, ...)
        bio_chain(...)
        make_request_fn(split);
        generic_make_request(bio);
   } else
        make_request_fn(mddev, bio);

This way we first process the initial section of the bio (in 'split')
which will queue some requests to the underlying devices.  These
requests will be queued in generic_make_request.
Then we queue the remainder of the bio, which will be added to the end
of the generic_make_request queue.
Then we return.
generic_make_request() will pop the lower-level device requests off the
queue and handle them first.  Then it will process the remainder
of the original bio once the first section has been fully processed.
"

Note, this only happens in read path. In write path, the bio is flushed to
underlaying disks either by blk flush (from schedule) or offladed to raid1/10d.
It's queued in current->bio_list.

Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Suggested-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/raid10.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1470,7 +1470,25 @@ static void raid10_make_request(struct m
 			split = bio;
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * If a bio is splitted, the first part of bio will pass
+		 * barrier but the bio is queued in current->bio_list (see
+		 * generic_make_request). If there is a raise_barrier() called
+		 * here, the second part of bio can't pass barrier. But since
+		 * the first part bio isn't dispatched to underlaying disks
+		 * yet, the barrier is never released, hence raise_barrier will
+		 * alays wait. We have a deadlock.
+		 * Note, this only happens in read path. For write path, the
+		 * first part of bio is dispatched in a schedule() call
+		 * (because of blk plug) or offloaded to raid10d.
+		 * Quitting from the function immediately can change the bio
+		 * order queued in bio_list and avoid the deadlock.
+		 */
 		__make_request(mddev, split);
+		if (split != bio && bio_data_dir(bio) == READ) {
+			generic_make_request(bio);
+			break;
+		}
 	} while (split != bio);
 
 	/* In case raid10d snuck in to freeze_array */


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from shli@fb.com are

queue-4.9/md-raid1-10-fix-potential-deadlock.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-03-24 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14903677918123@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.