From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Fix per-CPU structure initialization in" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:50:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490698213125134@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 4296f23ed49a15d36949458adcc66ff993dee2a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 14:30:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Fix per-CPU structure initialization in
sugov_start()
sugov_start() only initializes struct sugov_cpu per-CPU structures
for shared policies, but it should do that for single-CPU policies too.
That in particular makes the IO-wait boost mechanism work in the
cases when cpufreq policies correspond to individual CPUs.
Fixes: 21ca6d2c52f8 (cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 4.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.9+
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index cd7cd489f739..54c577578da6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -584,20 +584,14 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) {
struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, cpu);
+ memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu));
sg_cpu->sg_policy = sg_policy;
- if (policy_is_shared(policy)) {
- sg_cpu->util = 0;
- sg_cpu->max = 0;
- sg_cpu->flags = SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT;
- sg_cpu->last_update = 0;
- sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
- sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
- cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(cpu, &sg_cpu->update_util,
- sugov_update_shared);
- } else {
- cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(cpu, &sg_cpu->update_util,
- sugov_update_single);
- }
+ sg_cpu->flags = SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT;
+ sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
+ cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(cpu, &sg_cpu->update_util,
+ policy_is_shared(policy) ?
+ sugov_update_shared :
+ sugov_update_single);
}
return 0;
}
reply other threads:[~2017-03-28 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1490698213125134@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.