From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:04:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490699085858@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online
to the 4.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cpufreq-restore-policy-min-max-limits-on-cpu-online.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From ff010472fb75670cb5c08671e820eeea3af59c87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:36:06 +0530
Subject: cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
commit ff010472fb75670cb5c08671e820eeea3af59c87 upstream.
On CPU online the cpufreq core restores the previous governor (or
the previous "policy" setting for ->setpolicy drivers), but it does
not restore the min/max limits at the same time, which is confusing,
inconsistent and real pain for users who set the limits and then
suspend/resume the system (using full suspend), in which case the
limits are reset on all CPUs except for the boot one.
Fix this by making cpufreq_online() restore the limits when an inactive
policy is brought online.
The commit log and patch are inspired from Rafael's earlier work.
Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1190,6 +1190,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int c
for_each_cpu(j, policy->related_cpus)
per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, j) = policy;
write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+ } else {
+ policy->min = policy->user_policy.min;
+ policy->max = policy->user_policy.max;
}
if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from viresh.kumar@linaro.org are
queue-4.10/cpufreq-restore-policy-min-max-limits-on-cpu-online.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-03-28 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1490699085858@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.