diff for duplicates of <1490842268.2347.10.camel@intel.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 53814d0..e9f347d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 18:51 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > cpufreq_unregister_notifier(). > > > > Since cooling_list_lock is also used within > > > > cpufreq_thermal_notifier(), -> > > > lockdep reports a potential deadlock. I don't think that's +> > > > lockdep reports a potential deadlock.??I don't think that's > > > > actually > > > > possible, but it's easy enough to make it impossible by testing > > > > the @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 18:51 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > registered, > > > > and we know that anyway because we know whether the list > > > > transitioned -> > > > between empty and not-empty. So we can delete that variable +> > > > between empty and not-empty.??So we can delete that variable > > > > too. > > > > > > > > Fixes: ae606089621ef0349402cfcbeca33a82abbd0fd0 @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 18:51 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > Tested-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> > > > > > patch applied. -> It's almost three weeks, and it isn't in Linus' tree. What's +> It's almost three weeks, and it isn't in Linus' tree.??What's > happening > with this _fix_ for a regression that occured during the merge > window? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index b5e3336..88e2cf4 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,16 +5,10 @@ "ref\020170310234325.GB21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk\0" "ref\01489373088.5841.15.camel@intel.com\0" "ref\020170329175100.GD7909@n2100.armlinux.org.uk\0" - "From\0Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [BUG] v4.11-rc1: CPUFREQ Circular locking dependency\0" + "From\0rui.zhang@intel.com (Zhang Rui)\0" + "Subject\0[BUG] v4.11-rc1: CPUFREQ Circular locking dependency\0" "Date\0Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:51:08 +0800\0" - "To\0Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>\0" - "Cc\0Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>" - Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> - Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org> - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 18:51 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:\n" @@ -40,7 +34,7 @@ "> > > > cpufreq_unregister_notifier().\n" "> > > > Since cooling_list_lock is also used within\n" "> > > > cpufreq_thermal_notifier(),\n" - "> > > > lockdep reports a potential deadlock.\302\240\302\240I don't think that's\n" + "> > > > lockdep reports a potential deadlock.??I don't think that's\n" "> > > > actually\n" "> > > > possible, but it's easy enough to make it impossible by testing\n" "> > > > the\n" @@ -55,7 +49,7 @@ "> > > > registered,\n" "> > > > and we know that anyway because we know whether the list\n" "> > > > transitioned\n" - "> > > > between empty and not-empty.\302\240\302\240So we can delete that variable\n" + "> > > > between empty and not-empty.??So we can delete that variable\n" "> > > > too.\n" "> > > > \n" "> > > > Fixes: ae606089621ef0349402cfcbeca33a82abbd0fd0\n" @@ -66,7 +60,7 @@ "> > > Tested-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>\n" "> > > \n" "> > patch applied.\n" - "> It's almost three weeks, and it isn't in Linus' tree.\302\240\302\240What's\n" + "> It's almost three weeks, and it isn't in Linus' tree.??What's\n" "> happening\n" "> with this _fix_ for a regression that occured during the merge\n" "> window?\n" @@ -75,4 +69,4 @@ "\n" -rui -0c738da68f4daedb3248f500ecf6a1007dc9506ca7218b5d04b1c84fc222a6f3 +1a9f3e9e75d5c9289d5cc88811e3023daea1b6b45215fa258329f15eb0a58370
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.