From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 26BEFE00992; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [192.55.52.120 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03656E00826 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:56:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=intel; t=1490892975; x=1522428975; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id; bh=Nyp1ZdM+Z+wqJeVzH3hZkTg7xZK2NzbzlmjtnsKlMts=; b=ZWrueCtNx1KQrJCb0E+ecKWNO0uymWcv4XxIwPOzBSSJao7b2eMR9cHa CYsUBpdyW5A+EVoYMvTwl/5TV3Xm5w==; Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Mar 2017 09:56:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,247,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="1128989771" Received: from swold-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.254.113.228]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2017 09:56:14 -0700 From: Saul Wold To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:56:10 -0700 Message-Id: <1490892970-11447-1-git-send-email-sgw@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Subject: [PATCH] i386 machine.cfg: Explicitly disable 64BIT X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:56:19 -0000 Since we do not set the 64 bit flags, newer kernels seem to build 64bit config files by default. This is due to a hard-coded uname -m check that selects the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG based on the host, not the cross target. Similar to e9ec769926b2378e63380bd7762ce7ce201af151 in the yocto-kernel-cache repo [YOCTO #11230] Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- .../substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes-kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes-kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg b/scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes-kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg index 3b168b7..fe5b882 100644 --- a/scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes-kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg +++ b/scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes-kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ # yocto-bsp-filename {{=machine}}.cfg CONFIG_X86_32=y +# Must explicitly disable 64BIT +# CONFIG_64BIT is not set + CONFIG_MATOM=y CONFIG_PRINTK=y -- 2.7.4