From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id BB8C2E009B2; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:38:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [192.55.52.93 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C22E00961 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:38:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=intel; t=1490895523; x=1522431523; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UMBoEe36XFd1gqPxvn/IaLQXKAhz25w9KMt51UOMmLs=; b=a8bo+MjCJK9TsdUWzDiIuLfCNW9Ric3OoIMgtaKSMK7F55D9O0Q4SExm 3CwP05XpkLQ6j3FCWIk6OiBst5yQIw==; Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Mar 2017 10:38:42 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,247,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="71979763" Received: from swold-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.254.113.228]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2017 10:38:40 -0700 Message-ID: <1490895519.18921.279.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Saul Wold To: Leonardo Sandoval Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:38:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1490894066.17259.57.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1490892970-11447-1-git-send-email-sgw@linux.intel.com> <1490894066.17259.57.camel@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 machine.cfg: Explicitly disable 64BIT X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:38:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 11:14 -0600, Leonardo Sandoval wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:56 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > > > > Since we do not set the 64 bit flags, newer kernels seem to build > > 64bit > > config files by default. This is due to a hard-coded uname -m check > > that > > selects the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG based on the host, not the cross > > target. > > > > > Saul, this is poky code, so wrong list. > I am just having a bad day with email! Sau! > > > > > > Similar to e9ec769926b2378e63380bd7762ce7ce201af151 in the yocto- > > kernel-cache repo > > > > [YOCTO #11230] > > > > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold > > --- > >  .../substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes- > > kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg  | 3 +++ > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes- > > kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg > > b/scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes- > > kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg > > index 3b168b7..fe5b882 100644 > > --- a/scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes- > > kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg > > +++ b/scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes- > > kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg > > @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ > >  # yocto-bsp-filename {{=machine}}.cfg > >  CONFIG_X86_32=y > > +# Must explicitly disable 64BIT > > +# CONFIG_64BIT is not set > > + > >  CONFIG_MATOM=y > >  CONFIG_PRINTK=y > >   > > --  > > 2.7.4 > > > >