Re: [PATCH net-next] sock: correctly test SOCK_TIMESTAMP in sock_recv_ts_and_drops()

[Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 14:59 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> 
> It seems the code does not match the intent.
> 
> This broke packetdrill, and probably other programs.
> 
> Fixes: 6c7c98bad488 ("sock: avoid dirtying sk_stamp, if possible")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/net/sock.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 8e53158a7d957ea2a480cc449606dca2480b1259..66349e49d468646ce724485bb8e74952825f0d6c 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -2250,7 +2250,7 @@ static inline void sock_recv_ts_and_drops(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
>  
>  	if (sk->sk_flags & FLAGS_TS_OR_DROPS || sk->sk_tsflags & TSFLAGS_ANY)
>  		__sock_recv_ts_and_drops(msg, sk, skb);
> -	else if (unlikely(sk->sk_flags & SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
> +	else if (unlikely(sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP)))
>  		sk->sk_stamp = skb->tstamp;
>  	else if (unlikely(sk->sk_stamp == SK_DEFAULT_STAMP))
>  		sk->sk_stamp = 0;
> 

Oh, my bad! 

Thanks Eric for fixing this.

Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>