From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: bfoster@redhat.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hch@lst.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "xfs: fix eofblocks race with file extending async dio writes" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:33:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149106801424219@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
xfs: fix eofblocks race with file extending async dio writes
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
xfs-fix-eofblocks-race-with-file-extending-async-dio-writes.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From e4229d6b0bc9280f29624faf170cf76a9f1ca60e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 23:22:57 -0800
Subject: xfs: fix eofblocks race with file extending async dio writes
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
commit e4229d6b0bc9280f29624faf170cf76a9f1ca60e upstream.
It's possible for post-eof blocks to end up being used for direct I/O
writes. dio write performs an upfront unwritten extent allocation, sends
the dio and then updates the inode size (if necessary) on write
completion. If a file release occurs while a file extending dio write is
in flight, it is possible to mistake the post-eof blocks for speculative
preallocation and incorrectly truncate them from the inode. This means
that the resulting dio write completion can discover a hole and allocate
new blocks rather than perform unwritten extent conversion.
This requires a strange mix of I/O and is thus not likely to reproduce
in real world workloads. It is intermittently reproduced by generic/299.
The error manifests as an assert failure due to transaction overrun
because the aforementioned write completion transaction has only
reserved enough blocks for btree operations:
XFS: Assertion failed: tp->t_blk_res_used <= tp->t_blk_res, \
file: fs/xfs//xfs_trans.c, line: 309
The root cause is that xfs_free_eofblocks() uses i_size to truncate
post-eof blocks from the inode, but async, file extending direct writes
do not update i_size until write completion, long after inode locks are
dropped. Therefore, xfs_free_eofblocks() effectively truncates the inode
to the incorrect size.
Update xfs_free_eofblocks() to serialize against dio similar to how
extending writes are serialized against i_size updates before post-eof
block zeroing. Specifically, wait on dio while under the iolock. This
ensures that dio write completions have updated i_size before post-eof
blocks are processed.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -959,6 +959,9 @@ xfs_free_eofblocks(
if (error)
return error;
+ /* wait on dio to ensure i_size has settled */
+ inode_dio_wait(VFS_I(ip));
+
error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate, 0, 0, 0,
&tp);
if (error) {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bfoster@redhat.com are
queue-4.9/xfs-use-iomap-new-flag-for-newly-allocated-delalloc-blocks.patch
queue-4.9/xfs-handle-indlen-shortage-on-delalloc-extent-merge.patch
queue-4.9/xfs-reject-all-unaligned-direct-writes-to-reflinked-files.patch
queue-4.9/xfs-don-t-fail-xfs_extent_busy-allocation.patch
queue-4.9/xfs-sync-eofblocks-scans-under-iolock-are-livelock-prone.patch
queue-4.9/xfs-pull-up-iolock-from-xfs_free_eofblocks.patch
queue-4.9/xfs-split-indlen-reservations-fairly-when-under-reserved.patch
queue-4.9/xfs-fix-eofblocks-race-with-file-extending-async-dio-writes.patch
queue-4.9/xfs-fix-uninitialized-variable-in-_reflink_convert_cow.patch
queue-4.9/xfs-don-t-reserve-blocks-for-right-shift-transactions.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-04-01 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149106801424219@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.