From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvHiu-00041c-31 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 02:13:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvHir-0005Hg-0Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 02:13:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvHiq-0005HL-Qy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 02:13:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1491286422.1455.23.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 08:13:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5e1fc0b8-188c-28e8-7a4a-9f0388790219@redhat.com> References: <1490856931-21732-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1490881315.28523.11.camel@redhat.com> <1491221026.17505.39.camel@redhat.com> <5e1fc0b8-188c-28e8-7a4a-9f0388790219@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 0/4] make display updates thread safe. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland , Alex =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mo, 2017-04-03 at 19:02 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >=20 > On 03/04/2017 14:03, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > We might clear some more bits, but these are > > outsize the visible area so they should cause visible corruption (and i= f > > the visible area changes the display code needs to do a full refresh > > anyway). >=20 > True, though this makes the snapshot abstraction a little more > specialized. Please add a FIXME comment with the explanation, at least. Sure, I'll add a note to the (to be written) docs. cheers, Gerd