Re: [PATCH] cooker.py: multiconfig support for findBestProvider

[Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>]

On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 14:34 -0700, Juro Bystricky wrote:
> In a multiconfig environment, a tinfoil call such as
> 
>     tinfoil.parse_recipe("multiconfig:arduino-101-sss:gcc")
> 
> can fail with an error such as:
> 
>   File "/data/master/poky/bitbake/lib/bb/tinfoil.py", line 373, in get_recipe_file
>     raise bb.providers.NoProvider('Unable to find any recipe file matching "%s"' % pn)
> bb.providers.NoProvider: Unable to find any recipe file matching "multiconfig:arduino-101-sss:gcc"
> 
> The culprit is findBestProvider (only called from tinfoil), which does not
> handle multiconfig. This patch fixes the error and the tinfoil call returns absolute path
> to the recipe, i.e:
> 
>   "/data/master/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_6.3.bb"

So tinfoil.parse_recipe("multiconfig:arduino-101-sss:gcc") and
tinfoil.parse_recipe("gcc") then return identical data, because both end
up parsing "/data/master/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_6.3.bb"
without taking the "arduino-101-sss" config into account?

That wouldn't be correct.

As far as I understand it, the mapping has to be:
multiconfig:arduino-101-sss:gcc ->
multiconfig:arduino-101-sss:/data/master/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_6.3.bb

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.