From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12B777D94 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:06:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=intel; t=1491559620; x=1523095620; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3B1FVjI8DhmoEUSxJU6k3+Oj/TSShNBhJ2KQHQ3/ie8=; b=RliAkVeTYHil5QrDme3jv/2i1YNEyQ9vrnQhltbkP2tt7aho4XdBdWer Yo5aeLvGcuWvDBXCpJXezXTETzVn1w==; Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Apr 2017 03:06:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,164,1488873600"; d="scan'208";a="1132509389" Received: from jlock-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.6.1]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2017 03:06:56 -0700 Message-ID: <1491559615.3478.1.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Joshua Lock To: Khem Raj Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:06:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 (3.22.6-2.fc25) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for building on Fedora 26 (Alpha) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 10:06:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 06:50 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Joshua Lock > wrote: > > As Fedora 26 has a new gcc [1] and a new system pkg-config > > implementation [2] I > > wanted to do some testing on that host OS so that we might be able > > to get some > > fixes in before Pyro/2.3 is released. > > > > The following series were the only changes required to start > > building (I have > > tested core-image-minimal, core-image-base and core-image-sato) on > > Fedora 26. > > gcc patch looks fine to me. Thanks for the review. > > > > 1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC7 > > 2. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/pkgconf_as_system_pkg-con > > fig_implementation > > I think we should think about making pkgconf as default too for OE in > next release cycle. I've filed that as a 2.4 enhancement bug: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Joshua