From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Adjust the comment on get_order() to describe the size==0 case Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:39:25 +0000 Message-ID: <14925.1324395565@redhat.com> References: <201112201509.21334.arnd@arndb.de> <20111213145654.14362.39868.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20111213145704.14362.62471.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <4EEF8652.5060201@zytor.com> Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63497 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751414Ab1LTPjg (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:39:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201112201509.21334.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, "H. Peter Anvin" , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I generally prefer asm-generic patches to go through the trees that are > most interested in them (with my ack), which keeps the series close together > and lets me not maintain a separate tree for asm-generic most of the time. Should I resubmit the latter two patches detached from the first with the Acked-bys added? David