From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: lixiubo@cmss.chinamobile.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
iliastsi@arrikto.com, nab@linux-iscsi.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "tcmu: Skip Data-Out blocks before gathering Data-In buffer for BIDI case" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:50:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492519821235102@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
tcmu: Skip Data-Out blocks before gathering Data-In buffer for BIDI case
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
tcmu-skip-data-out-blocks-before-gathering-data-in-buffer-for-bidi-case.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From a5d68ba85801a78c892a0eb8efb711e293ed314b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xiubo Li <lixiubo@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:35:25 +0800
Subject: tcmu: Skip Data-Out blocks before gathering Data-In buffer for BIDI case
From: Xiubo Li <lixiubo@cmss.chinamobile.com>
commit a5d68ba85801a78c892a0eb8efb711e293ed314b upstream.
For the bidirectional case, the Data-Out buffer blocks will always at
the head of the tcmu_cmd's bitmap, and before gathering the Data-In
buffer, first of all it should skip the Data-Out ones, or the device
supporting BIDI commands won't work.
Fixed: 26418649eead ("target/user: Introduce data_bitmap, replace
data_length/data_head/data_tail")
Reported-by: Ilias Tsitsimpis <iliastsi@arrikto.com>
Tested-by: Ilias Tsitsimpis <iliastsi@arrikto.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <lixiubo@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/target/target_core_user.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
@@ -306,24 +306,50 @@ static void free_data_area(struct tcmu_d
DATA_BLOCK_BITS);
}
-static void gather_data_area(struct tcmu_dev *udev, unsigned long *cmd_bitmap,
- struct scatterlist *data_sg, unsigned int data_nents)
+static void gather_data_area(struct tcmu_dev *udev, struct tcmu_cmd *cmd,
+ bool bidi)
{
+ struct se_cmd *se_cmd = cmd->se_cmd;
int i, block;
int block_remaining = 0;
void *from, *to;
size_t copy_bytes, from_offset;
- struct scatterlist *sg;
+ struct scatterlist *sg, *data_sg;
+ unsigned int data_nents;
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, DATA_BLOCK_BITS);
+
+ bitmap_copy(bitmap, cmd->data_bitmap, DATA_BLOCK_BITS);
+
+ if (!bidi) {
+ data_sg = se_cmd->t_data_sg;
+ data_nents = se_cmd->t_data_nents;
+ } else {
+ uint32_t count;
+
+ /*
+ * For bidi case, the first count blocks are for Data-Out
+ * buffer blocks, and before gathering the Data-In buffer
+ * the Data-Out buffer blocks should be discarded.
+ */
+ count = DIV_ROUND_UP(se_cmd->data_length, DATA_BLOCK_SIZE);
+ while (count--) {
+ block = find_first_bit(bitmap, DATA_BLOCK_BITS);
+ clear_bit(block, bitmap);
+ }
+
+ data_sg = se_cmd->t_bidi_data_sg;
+ data_nents = se_cmd->t_bidi_data_nents;
+ }
for_each_sg(data_sg, sg, data_nents, i) {
int sg_remaining = sg->length;
to = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset;
while (sg_remaining > 0) {
if (block_remaining == 0) {
- block = find_first_bit(cmd_bitmap,
+ block = find_first_bit(bitmap,
DATA_BLOCK_BITS);
block_remaining = DATA_BLOCK_SIZE;
- clear_bit(block, cmd_bitmap);
+ clear_bit(block, bitmap);
}
copy_bytes = min_t(size_t, sg_remaining,
block_remaining);
@@ -600,19 +626,11 @@ static void tcmu_handle_completion(struc
se_cmd->scsi_sense_length);
free_data_area(udev, cmd);
} else if (se_cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_BIDI) {
- DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, DATA_BLOCK_BITS);
-
/* Get Data-In buffer before clean up */
- bitmap_copy(bitmap, cmd->data_bitmap, DATA_BLOCK_BITS);
- gather_data_area(udev, bitmap,
- se_cmd->t_bidi_data_sg, se_cmd->t_bidi_data_nents);
+ gather_data_area(udev, cmd, true);
free_data_area(udev, cmd);
} else if (se_cmd->data_direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
- DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, DATA_BLOCK_BITS);
-
- bitmap_copy(bitmap, cmd->data_bitmap, DATA_BLOCK_BITS);
- gather_data_area(udev, bitmap,
- se_cmd->t_data_sg, se_cmd->t_data_nents);
+ gather_data_area(udev, cmd, false);
free_data_area(udev, cmd);
} else if (se_cmd->data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
free_data_area(udev, cmd);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from lixiubo@cmss.chinamobile.com are
queue-4.9/tcmu-fix-wrongly-calculating-of-the-base_command_size.patch
queue-4.9/tcmu-fix-possible-overwrite-of-t_data_sg-s-last-iov.patch
queue-4.9/tcmu-skip-data-out-blocks-before-gathering-data-in-buffer-for-bidi-case.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1492519821235102@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iliastsi@arrikto.com \
--cc=lixiubo@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.