From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yu.c.chen@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, tmn505@gmail.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cpufreq: Bring CPUs up even if cpufreq_online() failed" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:00:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492524025115133@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cpufreq: Bring CPUs up even if cpufreq_online() failed
to the 4.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cpufreq-bring-cpus-up-even-if-cpufreq_online-failed.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From c4a3fa261b16858416f1fd7db03a33d7ef5fc0b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 13:45:16 +0800
Subject: cpufreq: Bring CPUs up even if cpufreq_online() failed
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
commit c4a3fa261b16858416f1fd7db03a33d7ef5fc0b3 upstream.
There is a report that after commit 27622b061eb4 ("cpufreq: Convert
to hotplug state machine"), the normal CPU offline/online cycle
fails on some platforms.
According to the ftrace result, this problem was triggered on
platforms using acpi-cpufreq as the default cpufreq driver,
and due to the lack of some ACPI freq method (eg. _PCT),
cpufreq_online() failed and returned a negative value, so the CPU
hotplug state machine rolled back the CPU online process. Actually,
from the user's perspective, the failure of cpufreq_online() should
not prevent that CPU from being brought up, although cpufreq might
not work on that CPU.
BTW, during system startup cpufreq_online() is not invoked via CPU
online but by the cpufreq device creation process, so the APs can be
brought up even though cpufreq_online() fails in that stage.
This patch ignores the return value of cpufreq_online/offline() and
lets the cpufreq framework deal with the failure. cpufreq_online()
itself will do a proper rollback in that case and if _PCT is missing,
the ACPI cpufreq driver will print a warning if the corresponding
debug options have been enabled.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194581
Fixes: 27622b061eb4 ("cpufreq: Convert to hotplug state machine")
Reported-and-tested-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn505@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2405,6 +2405,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled)
*********************************************************************/
static enum cpuhp_state hp_online;
+static int cpuhp_cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ cpufreq_online(cpu);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int cpuhp_cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ cpufreq_offline(cpu);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* cpufreq_register_driver - register a CPU Frequency driver
* @driver_data: A struct cpufreq_driver containing the values#
@@ -2467,8 +2481,8 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufr
}
ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "cpufreq:online",
- cpufreq_online,
- cpufreq_offline);
+ cpuhp_cpufreq_online,
+ cpuhp_cpufreq_offline);
if (ret < 0)
goto err_if_unreg;
hp_online = ret;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from yu.c.chen@intel.com are
queue-4.10/cpufreq-bring-cpus-up-even-if-cpufreq_online-failed.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1492524025115133@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmn505@gmail.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.