From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: daeho.jeong@samsung.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, nix@esperi.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu,
youngjin.gil@samsung.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ext4: fix inode checksum calculation problem if i_extra_size is small" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:34:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149260525510070@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ext4: fix inode checksum calculation problem if i_extra_size is small
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ext4-fix-inode-checksum-calculation-problem-if-i_extra_size-is-small.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 05ac5aa18abd7db341e54df4ae2b4c98ea0e43b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:49:12 -0500
Subject: ext4: fix inode checksum calculation problem if i_extra_size is small
From: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
commit 05ac5aa18abd7db341e54df4ae2b4c98ea0e43b7 upstream.
We've fixed the race condition problem in calculating ext4 checksum
value in commit b47820edd163 ("ext4: avoid modifying checksum fields
directly during checksum veficationon"). However, by this change,
when calculating the checksum value of inode whose i_extra_size is
less than 4, we couldn't calculate the checksum value in a proper way.
This problem was found and reported by Nix, Thank you.
Reported-by: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Youngjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -71,10 +71,9 @@ static __u32 ext4_inode_csum(struct inod
csum = ext4_chksum(sbi, csum, (__u8 *)&dummy_csum,
csum_size);
offset += csum_size;
- csum = ext4_chksum(sbi, csum, (__u8 *)raw + offset,
- EXT4_INODE_SIZE(inode->i_sb) -
- offset);
}
+ csum = ext4_chksum(sbi, csum, (__u8 *)raw + offset,
+ EXT4_INODE_SIZE(inode->i_sb) - offset);
}
return csum;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daeho.jeong@samsung.com are
queue-4.9/ext4-fix-inode-checksum-calculation-problem-if-i_extra_size-is-small.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-04-19 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149260525510070@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=daeho.jeong@samsung.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=youngjin.gil@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.