From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B977199E for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Apr 2017 15:17:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,222,1488873600"; d="scan'208";a="89914506" Received: from swold-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.254.100.124]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Apr 2017 15:17:44 -0700 From: Saul Wold To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:17:42 -0700 Message-Id: <1492640262-18359-1-git-send-email-sgw@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Subject: [PATCH] sstate: Ensure PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS are part of SSTATE_ARCHS X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:17:45 -0000 Since BSPs also define package archs that are included in PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS we should also enure they are accounted for in SSTATE_ARCH. This helps with the license manifest issue in some cases. Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta/classes/sstate.bbclass | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass index e50a385..614c3a0 100644 --- a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ SSTATE_ARCHS = " \ ${SDK_ARCH}_${PACKAGE_ARCH} \ allarch \ ${PACKAGE_ARCH} \ + ${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS} \ ${MACHINE}" SSTATE_MANMACH ?= "${SSTATE_PKGARCH}" -- 2.7.4