From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
James Hartsock <hartsjc@redhat.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Tim Wright <tim@binbash.co.uk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nohz: Fix again collision between tick and other hrtimers
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:00:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492704006.8850.201.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492702230-28462-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 17:30 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> (This restores commit 24b91e360ef521a2808771633d76ebc68bd5604b that
> got
> reverted by commit 558e8e27e73f53f8a512485be538b07115fe5f3c due to a
> regression where CPUs spuriously stopped ticking. The issue happened
> when a tick fired too early past its expected expiration: on IRQ exit
> the tick was scheduled again to the same deadline but skipped
> reprogramming because ts->next_tick still kept in cache the deadline.
> This has been fixed now with resetting ts->next_tick from the tick
> itself. Extra care has also been taken to prevent from obsolete
> values
> throughout CPU hotplug operations.)
>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-20 15:30 [PATCH 0/2] nohz: Deal with clock reprogram skipping issues Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-20 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] nohz: Fix again collision between tick and other hrtimers Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-20 16:00 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2017-04-20 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] tick: Make sure tick timer is active when bypassing reprogramming Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-20 16:01 ` Rik van Riel
2017-04-20 17:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-20 18:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-20 19:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-20 23:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-21 14:00 [PATCH 0/2] nohz: Deal with clock reprogram skipping issues v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-21 14:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] nohz: Fix again collision between tick and other hrtimers Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1492704006.8850.201.camel@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hartsjc@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim@binbash.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.