From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:29:34 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Message-Id: <1492799374.2550.24.camel@sandisk.com> List-Id: References: <1935365a-bd7c-461e-6a84-0c5d3a501fff@users.sourceforge.net> <1492720654.3041.16.camel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "leonro@mellanox.com" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "yishaih@mellanox.com" , "sean.hefty@intel.com" , "elfring@users.sourceforge.net" , "majd@mellanox.com" , "hal.rosenstock@gmail.com" , "dledford@redhat.com" , "matanb@mellanox.com" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org" On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 20:17 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > Several update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. Hello Markus, Patches should either be useful to users of the Linux kernel, e.g. by adding new functionality or by fixing a bug, or to kernel developers, e.g. by making their workflow easier. I don't think this patch series falls in either category so please drop these patches. Thanks, Bart.