From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: johannes@sipsolutions.net (Johannes Berg)
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:53:02 +0200
Subject: [Cocci] modifying array initializers?
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704211607100.3038@hadrien>
References: <1492780343.2564.4.camel@sipsolutions.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704211607100.3038@hadrien>
Message-ID: <1492800782.19290.1.camel@sipsolutions.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 16:07 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> Just add ..., here (note the comma at the end).

I thought I tried that, but maybe not. It doesn't work - at least in my
version - though:

HANDLING: net/wireless/nl80211.c
?????
previous modification:

? <<< static int wrap_fn(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
? <<< {
? <<< return fn(skb, info);
? <<< }
? <<<?
CONTEXT
According to environment 2:
???rule starting on line 1.wrap_fn -> id _wrap_nl80211_wiphy_netns
???rule starting on line 1.fn -> id nl80211_wiphy_netns

current modification:

? <<< static int wrap_fn(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
? <<< {
? <<< return fn(skb, info);
? <<< }
? <<<?
CONTEXT
According to environment 2:
???rule starting on line 1.wrap_fn -> id _wrap_nl80211_vendor_cmd
???rule starting on line 1.fn -> id nl80211_vendor_cmd

Fatal error: exception Failure("rule starting on line 1: already tagged
fake token\n")


Sounds like it doesn't like to add multiple things here, let me think
about how to work around that.

johannes