From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: dan.j.williams@intel.com, axboe@fb.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jack@suse.cz, robert.hu@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "block: fix del_gendisk() vs blkdev_ioctl crash" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:20:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149312284741100@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
block: fix del_gendisk() vs blkdev_ioctl crash
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
block-fix-del_gendisk-vs-blkdev_ioctl-crash.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From ac34f15e0c6d2fd58480052b6985f6991fb53bcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:02:29 -0800
Subject: block: fix del_gendisk() vs blkdev_ioctl crash
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
commit ac34f15e0c6d2fd58480052b6985f6991fb53bcc upstream.
When tearing down a block device early in its lifetime, userspace may
still be performing discovery actions like blkdev_ioctl() to re-read
partitions.
The nvdimm_revalidate_disk() implementation depends on
disk->driverfs_dev to be valid at entry. However, it is set to NULL in
del_gendisk() and fatally this is happening *before* the disk device is
deleted from userspace view.
There's no reason for del_gendisk() to clear ->driverfs_dev. That
device is the parent of the disk. It is guaranteed to not be freed
until the disk, as a child, drops its ->parent reference.
We could also fix this issue locally in nvdimm_revalidate_disk() by
using disk_to_dev(disk)->parent, but lets fix it globally since
->driverfs_dev follows the lifetime of the parent. Longer term we
should probably just add a @parent parameter to add_disk(), and stop
carrying this pointer in the gendisk.
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<ffffffffa00340a8>] nvdimm_revalidate_disk+0x18/0x90 [libnvdimm]
CPU: 2 PID: 538 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G O 4.4.0-rc5 #2257
[..]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8143e5c7>] rescan_partitions+0x87/0x2c0
[<ffffffff810f37f9>] ? __lock_is_held+0x49/0x70
[<ffffffff81438c62>] __blkdev_reread_part+0x72/0xb0
[<ffffffff81438cc5>] blkdev_reread_part+0x25/0x40
[<ffffffff8143982d>] blkdev_ioctl+0x4fd/0x9c0
[<ffffffff811246c9>] ? current_kernel_time64+0x69/0xd0
[<ffffffff812916dd>] block_ioctl+0x3d/0x50
[<ffffffff81264c38>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x308/0x560
[<ffffffff8115dbd1>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xb1/0x100
[<ffffffff810031d6>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x66/0x70
[<ffffffff81264f09>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
[<ffffffff81902672>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Reported-by: Robert Hu <robert.hu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
block/genhd.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -664,7 +664,6 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
kobject_put(disk->part0.holder_dir);
kobject_put(disk->slave_dir);
- disk->driverfs_dev = NULL;
if (!sysfs_deprecated)
sysfs_remove_link(block_depr, dev_name(disk_to_dev(disk)));
pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio(disk_to_dev(disk), false);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dan.j.williams@intel.com are
queue-4.4/block-fix-del_gendisk-vs-blkdev_ioctl-crash.patch
queue-4.4/x86-pmem-fix-broken-__copy_user_nocache-cache-bypass-assumptions.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-04-25 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149312284741100@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.