Status of Meson GPIO IRQ support

[jbrunet@baylibre.com (Jerome Brunet)]

On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 23:28 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Am 15.03.2017 um 08:50 schrieb Jerome Brunet:
> > On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 21:41 +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > > Jerome,
> > > 
> > > when working on Meson I2C driver I was testing with a device where I
> > > wanted
> > > to use a GPIO as interrupt source.
> > > This isn't supported yet and when checking I found that end of last year
> > > you submitted related patches. After some intense discussions I found no
> > > further update.
> > > Was this topic put on-hold due to bigger technical issues?
> > > 
> > 
> > Well, the proposed code does work but, as you have probaly seen for
> > yourself,
> > the maintainers of irqchip and gpio raised valid concerns, mainly about the
> > way
> > the mapping is created in the gpio driver. Ideally, the mapping should be
> > created at probe time but, with a hierarchic interrupt domain, that means
> > allocating the parent irq. We only have 8 of those for 100+ gpios.?
> > 
> > I'm still not sure how to address the problem to be honest: Is there a way
> > to
> > create mapping in hierarchy domain and allocate the parent only when the irq
> > is
> > actually requested ? Or should we simply not use a hierarchy domain for this
> > controller (which seems to make sense) ?
> > 
> 
> Meanwhile I became somewhat familiar with the irq subsystem and do some tests
> with a GPIO IRQ driver based on GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP (in generic chained mode).

While I'm sure a chained mode implementation would work, I think it would be
incorrect.

As far as I understood, chained mode is designed for controllers which actually
get an interrupt and need to figure out which attached device triggered it.

Imagine you have one IRQ per gpio bank and a register in the gpio controller
telling you which gpio line triggered it (It's a pretty usual design)
         _______________
         |           0 | 
PCTL <---|             |
         | GPIO ctl *1*|<--- Dev B
         |_____________|
 
The GPIO controller is actually involved in the processing of the IRQ. It
receives a signal from the device, set the register value, a trigger the IRQ on
the parent controller (PCTL, in our case: the GIC). I think this is chained
mode.

Our case it is more like this:
????? ???_______________
???? ????|???????????0 |
PCTL <---|------|??????|
         |      |----1-|<--- Dev B
         |_____________|

It simply is a static routing of a signal. The controller is not involved in the
IRQ processing. The signal generated by the device is directly given to the
PCTL.

What's important here is that the GPIO-IRQ controller does not generate the IRQ.
It is not capable of generating an IRQ on the PCTL on its own.

> 
> This basically works, however I have a problem with edge detection.
> Level changes are not reliably detected. If I connect an input pin (configured
> for edge irq generation) to a output pin and change the value of the output
> pin
> no edge is detected. However if I use a cable to connect the input pin to
> VCC/GND manually then most of the time edges are detected (not always).
> Did you ever come across a similar problem during your tests?

Nope, I did not see such a thing. I have mostly tested using a button connected
to gpio (which should be similar to the VCC/GND cable setup you decribed). I've
always got all the IRQs I expected to receive.

If you can, you should try to hook a scope, or at least a voltmeter, check if
you've got valid binary signals.

> 
> Regards, Heiner
> 
> > I still hope to be able to do something on this topic but probably not
> > tomorrow
> > :( Of course, If you have some spare time and want to contribute on this
> > topic,
> > you are welcome to do so.
> > 
> > > Rgds, Heiner
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > Jerome
> > 
> 
>