Re: [PATCH net-next] net: vrf: Do not allow looback to be moved to a VRF

[Greg Rose <gvrose8192@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 07:58 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> Moving the loopback into a VRF breaks networking for the default VRF.
> Since the VRF device is the loopback for VRF domains, there is no
> reason to move the loopback. Given the repercussions, block attempts
> to set lo into a VRF.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/vrf.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> index aa5d30428bba..ceda5861da78 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> @@ -877,6 +877,12 @@ static int do_vrf_add_slave(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *port_dev)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	/* do not allow loopback device to be enslaved to a VRF.
> +	 * The vrf device acts as the loopback for the vrf.
> +	 */
> +	if (port_dev == dev_net(dev)->loopback_dev)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
>  	port_dev->priv_flags |= IFF_L3MDEV_SLAVE;
>  	ret = netdev_master_upper_dev_link(port_dev, dev, NULL, NULL);
>  	if (ret < 0)

I think that's a great idea.

Reviewed-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8192@gmail.com>