From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Bart Van Assche To: "osandov@osandov.com" CC: "osandov@fb.com" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "hare@suse.com" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "ming.lei@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: Fix the comment above blk_mq_quiesce_queue() Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 22:40:21 +0000 Message-ID: <1493332819.2625.14.camel@sandisk.com> References: <20170427155437.23228-1-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> <20170427155437.23228-3-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> <20170427223713.GA2806@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20170427223713.GA2806@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 15:37 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 08:54:33AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > The first version of blk_mq_quiesce_queue() that was posted on > > the linux-block mailing list waited for ongoing .queue_rq() > > calls but did not stop the request queue. The current version > > however stops the request queue. Hence reflect this behavior in > > the comment above that function. >=20 > Can you just combine this with patch 1? Hello Omar, Patch 1/6 has a "Cc: stable" tag but this patch not. The comment change is a separate patch because I don't think this comment change needs to be integrated in the stable kernel series. Bart.=