All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1493823533.11226.28.camel@nxp.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index e8ff26c..1848f96 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -18,15 +18,15 @@ On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 16:26 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
 > > Hi Marek,
 > Hi Shawn,
 > 
-> > Thanks for your patch.  But I prefer Leonard's version because: 1) it
+> > Thanks for your patch.??But I prefer Leonard's version because: 1) it
 > > has a better commit log; 2) it sticks to one-patch-does-one-thing
 > > policy.
 
 > 2) It actually fixes a problem with the voltage rails such that the DVFS
->    works without leaving the system in unstable or dead state. You do
->    need the second part of my patch if you drop the OPP hackery, without
->    it the power framework cannot correctly configure the core voltages,
->    so the patch from Leonard makes things worse.
+> ???works without leaving the system in unstable or dead state. You do
+> ???need the second part of my patch if you drop the OPP hackery, without
+> ???it the power framework cannot correctly configure the core voltages,
+> ???so the patch from Leonard makes things worse.
 
 No, I think there is a misunderstanding here. The second part of your
 patch will cause cpufreq poking at LDOs to indirectly adjust the input
@@ -51,6 +51,6 @@ are enabled there is no good reason to do this.
 I don't care which patch goes in but the effect of the patch should be
 clarified.
 
--- 
+--?
 Regards,
 Leonard
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 6f4dfcf..c751fa1 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,22 +5,10 @@
  "ref\0f3bbd20c-2132-1121-1044-ba00dba302d6@denx.de\0"
  "ref\020170503135715.GG18578@dragon\0"
  "ref\076e22a7e-590f-00ee-04f8-87604303eaad@denx.de\0"
- "From\0Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6sx-sdb: Remove cpufreq OPP override\0"
+ "From\0leonard.crestez@nxp.com (Leonard Crestez)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6sx-sdb: Remove cpufreq OPP override\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 3 May 2017 17:58:53 +0300\0"
- "To\0Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>"
- " Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>"
-  Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
-  Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@nxp.com>
-  Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
-  linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
-  Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-  Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
-  linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
-  Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
- " Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 16:26 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:\n"
@@ -43,15 +31,15 @@
  "> > Hi Marek,\n"
  "> Hi Shawn,\n"
  "> \n"
- "> > Thanks for your patch.\302\240\302\240But I prefer Leonard's version because: 1) it\n"
+ "> > Thanks for your patch.??But I prefer Leonard's version because: 1) it\n"
  "> > has a better commit log; 2) it sticks to one-patch-does-one-thing\n"
  "> > policy.\n"
  "\n"
  "> 2) It actually fixes a problem with the voltage rails such that the DVFS\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240works without leaving the system in unstable or dead state. You do\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240need the second part of my patch if you drop the OPP hackery, without\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240it the power framework cannot correctly configure the core voltages,\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240so the patch from Leonard makes things worse.\n"
+ "> ???works without leaving the system in unstable or dead state. You do\n"
+ "> ???need the second part of my patch if you drop the OPP hackery, without\n"
+ "> ???it the power framework cannot correctly configure the core voltages,\n"
+ "> ???so the patch from Leonard makes things worse.\n"
  "\n"
  "No, I think there is a misunderstanding here. The second part of your\n"
  "patch will cause cpufreq poking at LDOs to indirectly adjust the input\n"
@@ -76,8 +64,8 @@
  "I don't care which patch goes in but the effect of the patch should be\n"
  "clarified.\n"
  "\n"
- "--\302\240\n"
+ "--?\n"
  "Regards,\n"
  Leonard
 
-25d6c7e19b171009fb7b5594339b4334b42eb49cb571faea74077554a01e7398
+07b8efa682a2c37874085543012bbb5c06f0bced4474c2a25df8560763220de0

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.