diff for duplicates of <1493890943.11226.42.camel@nxp.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 3aa9339..138f04f 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -5,10 +5,10 @@ On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 21:33 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 16:26 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > 2) It actually fixes a problem with the voltage rails such that the DVFS -> > > > > works without leaving the system in unstable or dead state. You do -> > > > > need the second part of my patch if you drop the OPP hackery, without -> > > > > it the power framework cannot correctly configure the core voltages, -> > > > > so the patch from Leonard makes things worse. +> > > > > ? works without leaving the system in unstable or dead state. You do +> > > > > ? need the second part of my patch if you drop the OPP hackery, without +> > > > > ? it the power framework cannot correctly configure the core voltages, +> > > > > ? so the patch from Leonard makes things worse. > > > > No, I think there is a misunderstanding here. The second part of your > > > > patch will cause cpufreq poking at LDOs to indirectly adjust the input diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 189e4a2..5a75ac4 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -9,22 +9,10 @@ "ref\0e46a57c2-4a28-a8b6-445e-299dd9d8659c@denx.de\0" "ref\01493834298.11226.40.camel@nxp.com\0" "ref\051fb1bd0-028d-c431-acc8-3c4f1d25fdba@denx.de\0" - "From\0Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6sx-sdb: Remove cpufreq OPP override\0" + "From\0leonard.crestez@nxp.com (Leonard Crestez)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6sx-sdb: Remove cpufreq OPP override\0" "Date\0Thu, 4 May 2017 12:42:23 +0300\0" - "To\0Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>\0" - "Cc\0Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@nxp.com>" - Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com> - linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org> - Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com> - Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> - Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com> - Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> - Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 21:33 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:\n" @@ -34,10 +22,10 @@ "> > > > On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 16:26 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:\n" "\n" "> > > > > 2) It actually fixes a problem with the voltage rails such that the DVFS\n" - "> > > > > \302\240 works without leaving the system in unstable or dead state. You do\n" - "> > > > > \302\240 need the second part of my patch if you drop the OPP hackery, without\n" - "> > > > > \302\240 it the power framework cannot correctly configure the core voltages,\n" - "> > > > > \302\240 so the patch from Leonard makes things worse.\n" + "> > > > > ? works without leaving the system in unstable or dead state. You do\n" + "> > > > > ? need the second part of my patch if you drop the OPP hackery, without\n" + "> > > > > ? it the power framework cannot correctly configure the core voltages,\n" + "> > > > > ? so the patch from Leonard makes things worse.\n" "\n" "> > > > No, I think there is a misunderstanding here. The second part of your\n" "> > > > patch will cause cpufreq poking at LDOs to indirectly adjust the input\n" @@ -81,4 +69,4 @@ "Regards,\n" Leonard -d269695584daf08f1b2d15425823062d59ba123b5be1ad1faf2e962867a71153 +b538d12ceacf0cc95530ef8ea59337abec10ca8cb10118194b1c230bb50f11c8
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.