All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tytso@mit.edu, ebiggers@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing the key" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 11:02:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14940073617451@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing the key

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ext4-crypto-revalidate-dentry-after-adding-or-removing-the-key.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 28b4c263961c47da84ed8b5be0b5116bad1133eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:35:05 -0500
Subject: ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing the key

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

commit 28b4c263961c47da84ed8b5be0b5116bad1133eb upstream.

Add a validation check for dentries for encrypted directory to make
sure we're not caching stale data after a key has been added or removed.

Also check to make sure that status of the encryption key is updated
when readdir(2) is executed.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/ext4/crypto.c |   50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/ext4/dir.c    |    6 ++++++
 fs/ext4/ext4.h   |    1 +
 fs/ext4/namei.c  |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ext4/crypto.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
@@ -469,3 +469,53 @@ uint32_t ext4_validate_encryption_key_si
 		return size;
 	return 0;
 }
+
+/*
+ * Validate dentries for encrypted directories to make sure we aren't
+ * potentially caching stale data after a key has been added or
+ * removed.
+ */
+static int ext4_d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	struct inode *dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
+	struct ext4_crypt_info *ci = EXT4_I(dir)->i_crypt_info;
+	int dir_has_key, cached_with_key;
+
+	if (!ext4_encrypted_inode(dir))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* this should eventually be an flag in d_flags */
+	cached_with_key = dentry->d_fsdata != NULL;
+	dir_has_key = (ci != NULL);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the dentry was cached without the key, and it is a
+	 * negative dentry, it might be a valid name.  We can't check
+	 * if the key has since been made available due to locking
+	 * reasons, so we fail the validation so ext4_lookup() can do
+	 * this check.
+	 *
+	 * We also fail the validation if the dentry was created with
+	 * the key present, but we no longer have the key, or vice versa.
+	 */
+	if ((!cached_with_key && d_is_negative(dentry)) ||
+	    (!cached_with_key && dir_has_key) ||
+	    (cached_with_key && !dir_has_key)) {
+#if 0				/* Revalidation debug */
+		char buf[80];
+		char *cp = simple_dname(dentry, buf, sizeof(buf));
+
+		if (IS_ERR(cp))
+			cp = (char *) "???";
+		pr_err("revalidate: %s %p %d %d %d\n", cp, dentry->d_fsdata,
+		       cached_with_key, d_is_negative(dentry),
+		       dir_has_key);
+#endif
+		return 0;
+	}
+	return 1;
+}
+
+const struct dentry_operations ext4_encrypted_d_ops = {
+	.d_revalidate = ext4_d_revalidate,
+};
--- a/fs/ext4/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/dir.c
@@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ static int ext4_readdir(struct file *fil
 	int dir_has_error = 0;
 	struct ext4_str fname_crypto_str = {.name = NULL, .len = 0};
 
+	if (ext4_encrypted_inode(inode)) {
+		err = ext4_get_encryption_info(inode);
+		if (err && err != -ENOKEY)
+			return err;
+	}
+
 	if (is_dx_dir(inode)) {
 		err = ext4_dx_readdir(file, ctx);
 		if (err != ERR_BAD_DX_DIR) {
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -2268,6 +2268,7 @@ struct page *ext4_encrypt(struct inode *
 			  struct page *plaintext_page);
 int ext4_decrypt(struct page *page);
 int ext4_encrypted_zeroout(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_extent *ex);
+extern const struct dentry_operations ext4_encrypted_d_ops;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION
 int ext4_init_crypto(void);
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -1557,6 +1557,24 @@ static struct dentry *ext4_lookup(struct
 	struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de;
 	struct buffer_head *bh;
 
+       if (ext4_encrypted_inode(dir)) {
+               int res = ext4_get_encryption_info(dir);
+
+		/*
+		 * This should be a properly defined flag for
+		 * dentry->d_flags when we uplift this to the VFS.
+		 * d_fsdata is set to (void *) 1 if if the dentry is
+		 * created while the directory was encrypted and we
+		 * don't have access to the key.
+		 */
+	       dentry->d_fsdata = NULL;
+	       if (ext4_encryption_info(dir))
+		       dentry->d_fsdata = (void *) 1;
+	       d_set_d_op(dentry, &ext4_encrypted_d_ops);
+	       if (res && res != -ENOKEY)
+		       return ERR_PTR(res);
+       }
+
 	if (dentry->d_name.len > EXT4_NAME_LEN)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG);
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tytso@mit.edu are

queue-4.4/ext4-fscrypto-avoid-rcu-lookup-in-d_revalidate.patch
queue-4.4/ext4-crypto-revalidate-dentry-after-adding-or-removing-the-key.patch
queue-4.4/ext4-crypto-use-dget_parent-in-ext4_d_revalidate.patch
queue-4.4/ext4-require-encryption-feature-for-ext4_ioc_set_encryption_policy.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-05-05 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14940073617451@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.