All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Austin Christ <austinwc@codeaurora.org>,
	Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>,
	Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [RFC 2/2] sched/fair: Remove group imbalance from calculate_imbalance()
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:01:38 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494608498-4538-3-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1494608498-4538-1-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org>

The group_imbalance path in calculate_imbalance() made sense when it was
added back in 2007 with commit 908a7c1b9b80 ("sched: fix improper load
balance across sched domain") because busiest->load_per_task factored into
the amount of imbalance that was calculated. That is not the case today.

The group_imbalance path can only affect the outcome of
calculate_imbalance() when the average load of the domain is less than the
original busiest->load_per_task. In this case, busiest->load_per_task is
overwritten with the scheduling domain load average. Thus
busiest->load_per_task no longer represents actual load that can be moved.

At the final comparison between env->imbalance and busiest->load_per_task,
imbalance may be larger than the new busiest->load_per_task causing the
check to fail under the assumption that there is a task that could be
migrated to satisfy the imbalance. However env->imbalance may still be
smaller than the original busiest->load_per_task, thus it is unlikely that
there is a task that can be migrated to satisfy the imbalance.
Calculate_imbalance() would not choose to run fix_small_imbalance() when we
expect it should. In the worst case, this can result in idle cpus.

Since the group imbalance path in calculate_imbalance() is at best a NOP
but otherwise harmful, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8f783ba..3283561 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7760,15 +7760,6 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
 	local = &sds->local_stat;
 	busiest = &sds->busiest_stat;
 
-	if (busiest->group_type == group_imbalanced) {
-		/*
-		 * In the group_imb case we cannot rely on group-wide averages
-		 * to ensure cpu-load equilibrium, look at wider averages. XXX
-		 */
-		busiest->load_per_task =
-			min(busiest->load_per_task, sds->avg_load);
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * Avg load of busiest sg can be less and avg load of local sg can
 	 * be greater than avg load across all sgs of sd because avg load
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-12 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-12 17:01 [RFC 0/2] load_balance() fixes for affinity Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-12 17:01 ` [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-12 17:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 17:29     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-12 20:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 20:54         ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-12 20:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 20:57     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-15 14:56       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-05-18 14:31         ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-05-12 17:01 ` Jeffrey Hugo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1494608498-4538-3-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --to=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=austinwc@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.