From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux@roeck-us.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "usb: hub: Fix error loop seen after hub communication errors" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 12:31:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149493068524033@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
usb: hub: Fix error loop seen after hub communication errors
to the 4.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
usb-hub-fix-error-loop-seen-after-hub-communication-errors.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 245b2eecee2aac6fdc77dcafaa73c33f9644c3c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:16:11 -0700
Subject: usb: hub: Fix error loop seen after hub communication errors
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
commit 245b2eecee2aac6fdc77dcafaa73c33f9644c3c7 upstream.
While stress testing a usb controller using a bind/unbind looop, the
following error loop was observed.
usb 7-1.2: new low-speed USB device number 3 using xhci-hcd
usb 7-1.2: hub failed to enable device, error -108
usb 7-1-port2: cannot disable (err = -22)
usb 7-1-port2: couldn't allocate usb_device
usb 7-1-port2: cannot disable (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
** 57 printk messages dropped ** hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
** 82 printk messages dropped ** hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
This continues forever. After adding tracebacks into the code,
the call sequence leading to this is found to be as follows.
[<ffffffc0007fc8e0>] hub_activate+0x368/0x7b8
[<ffffffc0007fceb4>] hub_resume+0x2c/0x3c
[<ffffffc00080b3b8>] usb_resume_interface.isra.6+0x128/0x158
[<ffffffc00080b5d0>] usb_suspend_both+0x1e8/0x288
[<ffffffc00080c9c4>] usb_runtime_suspend+0x3c/0x98
[<ffffffc0007820a0>] __rpm_callback+0x48/0x7c
[<ffffffc00078217c>] rpm_callback+0xa8/0xd4
[<ffffffc000786234>] rpm_suspend+0x84/0x758
[<ffffffc000786ca4>] rpm_idle+0x2c8/0x498
[<ffffffc000786ed4>] __pm_runtime_idle+0x60/0xac
[<ffffffc00080eba8>] usb_autopm_put_interface+0x6c/0x7c
[<ffffffc000803798>] hub_event+0x10ac/0x12ac
[<ffffffc000249bb8>] process_one_work+0x390/0x6b8
[<ffffffc00024abcc>] worker_thread+0x480/0x610
[<ffffffc000251a80>] kthread+0x164/0x178
[<ffffffc0002045d0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
kick_hub_wq() is called from hub_activate() even after failures to
communicate with the hub. This results in an endless sequence of
hub event -> hub activate -> wq trigger -> hub event -> ...
Provide two solutions for the problem.
- Only trigger the hub event queue if communication with the hub
is successful.
- After a suspend failure, only resume already suspended interfaces
if the communication with the device is still possible.
Each of the changes fixes the observed problem. Use both to improve
robustness.
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/core/driver.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
@@ -1331,6 +1331,24 @@ static int usb_suspend_both(struct usb_d
*/
if (udev->parent && !PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg))
status = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * If the device is inaccessible, don't try to resume
+ * suspended interfaces and just return the error.
+ */
+ if (status && status != -EBUSY) {
+ int err;
+ u16 devstat;
+
+ err = usb_get_status(udev, USB_RECIP_DEVICE, 0,
+ &devstat);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(&udev->dev,
+ "Failed to suspend device, error %d\n",
+ status);
+ goto done;
+ }
+ }
}
/* If the suspend failed, resume interfaces that did get suspended */
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -1066,6 +1066,9 @@ static void hub_activate(struct usb_hub
portstatus = portchange = 0;
status = hub_port_status(hub, port1, &portstatus, &portchange);
+ if (status)
+ goto abort;
+
if (udev || (portstatus & USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION))
dev_dbg(&port_dev->dev, "status %04x change %04x\n",
portstatus, portchange);
@@ -1198,7 +1201,7 @@ static void hub_activate(struct usb_hub
/* Scan all ports that need attention */
kick_hub_wq(hub);
-
+ abort:
if (type == HUB_INIT2 || type == HUB_INIT3) {
/* Allow autosuspend if it was suppressed */
disconnected:
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from linux@roeck-us.net are
queue-4.10/usb-hub-do-not-attempt-to-autosuspend-disconnected-devices.patch
queue-4.10/usb-hub-fix-error-loop-seen-after-hub-communication-errors.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-05-16 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149493068524033@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.