From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:04:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:04:27 -0500 Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.181]:17682 "EHLO wire.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:04:16 -0500 From: Peter Samuelson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14950.16631.2919.360911@wire.cadcamlab.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:03:50 -0600 (CST) To: Mo McKinlay Cc: Subject: Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix In-Reply-To: <20010116182806.B6364@cadcamlab.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid X-Face: ?*2Jm8R'OlE|+C~V>u$CARJyKMOpJ"^kNhLusXnPTFBF!#8,jH/#=Iy(?ehN$jH }x;J6B@[z.Ad\Be5RfNB*1>Eh.'R%u2gRj)M4blT]vu%^Qq We went through this last time around. What happens to directories > with streams? Yeah, I agree, 'file/stream' is lousy syntax as well. If it weren't for the possibility of having streams on directories, it would almost be acceptible. I still don't know which (':' or '/') is the worse hack. As I've said elsewhere in this thread, I can't think of *any* clean way to shoehorn forks into nice, transparent posix calls. It really wants a new API. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/