All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: vegard.nossum@oracle.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "tty: fix port buffer locking" added to tty-linus
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 16:44:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495118659120203@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    tty: fix port buffer locking

to my tty git tree which can be found at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git
in the tty-linus branch.

The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)

The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.

If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.


>From 925bb1ce47f429f69aad35876df7ecd8c53deb7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 12:18:52 +0200
Subject: tty: fix port buffer locking

tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag() is racy against itself when called
from the ioctl(TCXONC, TCION/TCIOFF) path [1] and the flush_to_ldisc()
workqueue path [2].

The problem is that port->buf.tail->used is modified without consistent
locking; the ioctl path takes tty->atomic_write_lock, whereas the workqueue
path takes ldata->output_lock.

We cannot simply take ldata->output_lock, since that is specific to the
N_TTY line discipline.

It might seem natural to try to take port->buf.lock inside
tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag() and friends (where port->buf is
actually used/modified), but this creates problems for flush_to_ldisc()
which takes it before grabbing tty->ldisc_sem, o_tty->termios_rwsem,
and ldata->output_lock.

Therefore, the simplest solution for now seems to be to take
tty->atomic_write_lock inside tty_port_default_receive_buf(). This lock
is also used in the write path [3] with a consistent ordering.

[1]: Call Trace:
 tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag
 pty_write
 tty_send_xchar                     // down_read(&o_tty->termios_rwsem)
                                    // mutex_lock(&tty->atomic_write_lock)
 n_tty_ioctl_helper
 n_tty_ioctl
 tty_ioctl                          // down_read(&tty->ldisc_sem)
 do_vfs_ioctl
 SyS_ioctl

[2]: Workqueue: events_unbound flush_to_ldisc
Call Trace:
 tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag
 pty_write
 tty_put_char
 __process_echoes
 commit_echoes                      // mutex_lock(&ldata->output_lock)
 n_tty_receive_buf_common
 n_tty_receive_buf2
 tty_ldisc_receive_buf              // down_read(&o_tty->termios_rwsem)
 tty_port_default_receive_buf       // down_read(&tty->ldisc_sem)
 flush_to_ldisc                     // mutex_lock(&port->buf.lock)
 process_one_work

[3]: Call Trace:
 tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag
 pty_write
 n_tty_write                        // mutex_lock(&ldata->output_lock)
                                    // down_read(&tty->termios_rwsem)
 do_tty_write (inline)              // mutex_lock(&tty->atomic_write_lock)
 tty_write                          // down_read(&tty->ldisc_sem)
 __vfs_write
 vfs_write
 SyS_write

The bug can result in about a dozen different crashes depending on what
exactly gets corrupted when port->buf.tail->used points outside the
buffer.

The patch passes my LOCKDEP/PROVE_LOCKING testing but more testing is
always welcome.

Found using syzkaller.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_port.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_port.c b/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
index 0c880f17d27e..88dac3b79369 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ static int tty_port_default_receive_buf(struct tty_port *port,
 	if (!disc)
 		return 0;
 
+	mutex_lock(&tty->atomic_write_lock);
 	ret = tty_ldisc_receive_buf(disc, p, (char *)f, count);
+	mutex_unlock(&tty->atomic_write_lock);
 
 	tty_ldisc_deref(disc);
 
-- 
2.13.0

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-05-18 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1495118659120203@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.