All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: DRivshin@allworx.com, drivshin@allworx.com,
	grygorii.strashko@ti.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] gpio: omap: return error if requested debounce time is not" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 18:54:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <149547209477100@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From 83977443938122baeed28dc9f078db3da9855f7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rivshin <DRivshin@allworx.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:56:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: omap: return error if requested debounce time is not
 possible

omap_gpio_debounce() does not validate that the requested debounce
is within a range it can handle. Instead it lets the register value
wrap silently, and always returns success.

This can lead to all sorts of unexpected behavior, such as gpio_keys
asking for a too-long debounce, but getting a very short debounce in
practice.

Fix this by returning -EINVAL if the requested value does not fit into
the register field. If there is no debounce clock available at all,
return -ENOTSUPP.

Fixes: e85ec6c3047b ("gpio: omap: fix omap2_set_gpio_debounce")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3+
Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin@allworx.com>
Acked-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index 5d6a5744352f..f8c550de6c72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -208,9 +208,11 @@ static inline void omap_gpio_dbck_disable(struct gpio_bank *bank)
  * OMAP's debounce time is in 31us steps
  *   <debounce time> = (GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME[7:0].DEBOUNCETIME + 1) x 31
  * so we need to convert and round up to the closest unit.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, negative error otherwise.
  */
-static void omap2_set_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset,
-				    unsigned debounce)
+static int omap2_set_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset,
+				   unsigned debounce)
 {
 	void __iomem		*reg;
 	u32			val;
@@ -218,11 +220,12 @@ static void omap2_set_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset,
 	bool			enable = !!debounce;
 
 	if (!bank->dbck_flag)
-		return;
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
 
 	if (enable) {
 		debounce = DIV_ROUND_UP(debounce, 31) - 1;
-		debounce &= OMAP4_GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME_MASK;
+		if ((debounce & OMAP4_GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME_MASK) != debounce)
+			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	l = BIT(offset);
@@ -255,6 +258,8 @@ static void omap2_set_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset,
 		bank->context.debounce = debounce;
 		bank->context.debounce_en = val;
 	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -964,14 +969,20 @@ static int omap_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
 {
 	struct gpio_bank *bank;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
 
 	bank = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
-	omap2_set_gpio_debounce(bank, offset, debounce);
+	ret = omap2_set_gpio_debounce(bank, offset, debounce);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
 
-	return 0;
+	if (ret)
+		dev_info(chip->parent,
+			 "Could not set line %u debounce to %u microseconds (%d)",
+			 offset, debounce, ret);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int omap_gpio_set_config(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-05-22 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=149547209477100@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=DRivshin@allworx.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.