All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Name cpufreq cooling devices as cpufreq_cdev
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 14:37:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495521460.2303.4.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <323c25bfc9454e54102b0956bae049365f1ba2bb.1493115651.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 15:57 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Objects of "struct cpufreq_cooling_device" are named a bit
> inconsistently. Lets use cpufreq_cdev everywhere. Also note that the
> lists containing such devices is renamed similarly too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 248 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> ----------
>  1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
> 
> 

>  
>  	num_cpus = cpumask_weight(clip_cpus);
> -	cpufreq_dev->time_in_idle = kcalloc(num_cpus,
> -					    sizeof(*cpufreq_dev-
> >time_in_idle),
> +	cpufreq_cdev->time_in_idle = kcalloc(num_cpus,
> +					    sizeof(*cpufreq_cdev-
> >time_in_idle),
>  					    GFP_KERNEL);

checkpatch complains about this line

WARNING: Prefer kmalloc_array over kmalloc with multiply
#544: FILE: drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:827:
+	cpufreq_cdev->freq_table = kmalloc(sizeof(*cpufreq_cdev-
>freq_table) *
+					  cpufreq_cdev->max_level,
GFP_KERNEL);

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 614 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-
inplace.

and also patch 8/17.

It's better to get this fixed.

thanks,
rui


> -	if (!cpufreq_dev->time_in_idle) {
> +	if (!cpufreq_cdev->time_in_idle) {
>  		cool_dev = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  		goto free_cdev;
>  	}
>  
> -	cpufreq_dev->time_in_idle_timestamp =
> -		kcalloc(num_cpus, sizeof(*cpufreq_dev-
> >time_in_idle_timestamp),
> +	cpufreq_cdev->time_in_idle_timestamp =
> +		kcalloc(num_cpus, sizeof(*cpufreq_cdev-
> >time_in_idle_timestamp),
>  			GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!cpufreq_dev->time_in_idle_timestamp) {
> +	if (!cpufreq_cdev->time_in_idle_timestamp) {
>  		cool_dev = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  		goto free_time_in_idle;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Find max levels */
>  	cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table)
> -		cpufreq_dev->max_level++;
> +		cpufreq_cdev->max_level++;
>  
> -	cpufreq_dev->freq_table = kmalloc(sizeof(*cpufreq_dev-
> >freq_table) *
> -					  cpufreq_dev->max_level,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!cpufreq_dev->freq_table) {
> +	cpufreq_cdev->freq_table = kmalloc(sizeof(*cpufreq_cdev-
> >freq_table) *
> +					  cpufreq_cdev->max_level,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cpufreq_cdev->freq_table) {
>  		cool_dev = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  		goto free_time_in_idle_timestamp;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* max_level is an index, not a counter */
> -	cpufreq_dev->max_level--;
> +	cpufreq_cdev->max_level--;
>  
> -	cpumask_copy(&cpufreq_dev->allowed_cpus, clip_cpus);
> +	cpumask_copy(&cpufreq_cdev->allowed_cpus, clip_cpus);
>  
>  	if (capacitance) {
> -		cpufreq_dev->plat_get_static_power =
> plat_static_func;
> +		cpufreq_cdev->plat_get_static_power =
> plat_static_func;
>  
> -		ret = build_dyn_power_table(cpufreq_dev,
> capacitance);
> +		ret = build_dyn_power_table(cpufreq_cdev,
> capacitance);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			cool_dev = ERR_PTR(ret);
>  			goto free_table;
> @@ -856,12 +855,12 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node
> *np,
>  		cool_dev = ERR_PTR(ret);
>  		goto free_power_table;
>  	}
> -	cpufreq_dev->id = ret;
> +	cpufreq_cdev->id = ret;
>  
>  	/* Fill freq-table in descending order of frequencies */
> -	for (i = 0, freq = -1; i <= cpufreq_dev->max_level; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0, freq = -1; i <= cpufreq_cdev->max_level; i++) {
>  		freq = find_next_max(table, freq);
> -		cpufreq_dev->freq_table[i] = freq;
> +		cpufreq_cdev->freq_table[i] = freq;
>  
>  		/* Warn for duplicate entries */
>  		if (!freq)
> @@ -871,20 +870,21 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node
> *np,
>  	}
>  
>  	snprintf(dev_name, sizeof(dev_name), "thermal-cpufreq-%d",
> -		 cpufreq_dev->id);
> +		 cpufreq_cdev->id);
>  
> -	cool_dev = thermal_of_cooling_device_register(np, dev_name,
> cpufreq_dev,
> +	cool_dev = thermal_of_cooling_device_register(np, dev_name,
> +						      cpufreq_cdev,
>  						      cooling_ops);
>  	if (IS_ERR(cool_dev))
>  		goto remove_ida;
>  
> -	cpufreq_dev->clipped_freq = cpufreq_dev->freq_table[0];
> -	cpufreq_dev->cool_dev = cool_dev;
> +	cpufreq_cdev->clipped_freq = cpufreq_cdev->freq_table[0];
> +	cpufreq_cdev->cool_dev = cool_dev;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
>  	/* Register the notifier for first cpufreq cooling device */
> -	first = list_empty(&cpufreq_dev_list);
> -	list_add(&cpufreq_dev->node, &cpufreq_dev_list);
> +	first = list_empty(&cpufreq_cdev_list);
> +	list_add(&cpufreq_cdev->node, &cpufreq_cdev_list);
>  	mutex_unlock(&cooling_list_lock);
>  
>  	if (first)
> @@ -894,17 +894,17 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node
> *np,
>  	goto put_policy;
>  
>  remove_ida:
> -	ida_simple_remove(&cpufreq_ida, cpufreq_dev->id);
> +	ida_simple_remove(&cpufreq_ida, cpufreq_cdev->id);
>  free_power_table:
> -	kfree(cpufreq_dev->dyn_power_table);
> +	kfree(cpufreq_cdev->dyn_power_table);
>  free_table:
> -	kfree(cpufreq_dev->freq_table);
> +	kfree(cpufreq_cdev->freq_table);
>  free_time_in_idle_timestamp:
> -	kfree(cpufreq_dev->time_in_idle_timestamp);
> +	kfree(cpufreq_cdev->time_in_idle_timestamp);
>  free_time_in_idle:
> -	kfree(cpufreq_dev->time_in_idle);
> +	kfree(cpufreq_cdev->time_in_idle);
>  free_cdev:
> -	kfree(cpufreq_dev);
> +	kfree(cpufreq_cdev);
>  put_policy:
>  	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>  free_cpumask:
> @@ -1029,30 +1029,30 @@
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register);
>   */
>  void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
>  {
> -	struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_dev;
> +	struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev;
>  	bool last;
>  
>  	if (!cdev)
>  		return;
>  
> -	cpufreq_dev = cdev->devdata;
> +	cpufreq_cdev = cdev->devdata;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
> -	list_del(&cpufreq_dev->node);
> +	list_del(&cpufreq_cdev->node);
>  	/* Unregister the notifier for the last cpufreq cooling
> device */
> -	last = list_empty(&cpufreq_dev_list);
> +	last = list_empty(&cpufreq_cdev_list);
>  	mutex_unlock(&cooling_list_lock);
>  
>  	if (last)
>  		cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&thermal_cpufreq_notifie
> r_block,
>  					    CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER)
> ;
>  
> -	thermal_cooling_device_unregister(cpufreq_dev->cool_dev);
> -	ida_simple_remove(&cpufreq_ida, cpufreq_dev->id);
> -	kfree(cpufreq_dev->dyn_power_table);
> -	kfree(cpufreq_dev->time_in_idle_timestamp);
> -	kfree(cpufreq_dev->time_in_idle);
> -	kfree(cpufreq_dev->freq_table);
> -	kfree(cpufreq_dev);
> +	thermal_cooling_device_unregister(cpufreq_cdev->cool_dev);
> +	ida_simple_remove(&cpufreq_ida, cpufreq_cdev->id);
> +	kfree(cpufreq_cdev->dyn_power_table);
> +	kfree(cpufreq_cdev->time_in_idle_timestamp);
> +	kfree(cpufreq_cdev->time_in_idle);
> +	kfree(cpufreq_cdev->freq_table);
> +	kfree(cpufreq_cdev);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cooling_unregister);

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-23  6:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-25 10:27 [PATCH V4 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 01/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Avoid accessing potentially freed structures Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 02/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: rearrange globals Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 03/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Name cpufreq cooling devices as cpufreq_cdev Viresh Kumar
2017-05-23  6:37   ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2017-05-23  7:03     ` [PATCH] thermal: cpu_cooling: Replace kmalloc with kmalloc_array Viresh Kumar
2017-05-24  2:27       ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-05-24  3:51         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-05-23  7:04     ` [PATCH V4 03/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Name cpufreq cooling devices as cpufreq_cdev Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 04/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: replace cool_dev with cdev Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 05/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: remove cpufreq_cooling_get_level() Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 06/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of a variable in cpufreq_set_cur_state() Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 07/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_policy to register cooling device Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 08/17] cpufreq: create cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries() Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 09/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: store cpufreq policy Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 10/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: OPPs are registered for all CPUs Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 11/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of 'allowed_cpus' Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 12/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: merge frequency and power tables Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 13/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: create structure for idle time stats Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 14/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get_level() can't fail Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 15/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: don't store cpu_dev in cpufreq_cdev Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 16/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: 'freq' can't be zero in cpufreq_state2power() Viresh Kumar
2017-04-25 10:27 ` [PATCH V4 17/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Rearrange struct cpufreq_cooling_device Viresh Kumar
2017-04-26 10:41 ` [PATCH V4 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core Lukasz Luba
2017-04-26 10:47   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-27 16:26     ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-04-28  4:24       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-05-26  4:57   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-05-28  0:29     ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-05-24  2:41 ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-05-24  3:53   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-05-24  4:03     ` Eduardo Valentin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1495521460.2303.4.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.