From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "powerpc/mm: Ensure IRQs are off in switch_mm()" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 16:48:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149555093711817@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
powerpc/mm: Ensure IRQs are off in switch_mm()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
powerpc-mm-ensure-irqs-are-off-in-switch_mm.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 9765ad134a00a01cbcc69c78ff6defbfad209bc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:38:26 +1000
Subject: powerpc/mm: Ensure IRQs are off in switch_mm()
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
commit 9765ad134a00a01cbcc69c78ff6defbfad209bc5 upstream.
powerpc expects IRQs to already be (soft) disabled when switch_mm() is
called, as made clear in the commit message of 9c1e105238c4 ("powerpc: Allow
perf_counters to access user memory at interrupt time").
Aside from any race conditions that might exist between switch_mm() and an IRQ,
there is also an unconditional hard_irq_disable() in switch_slb(). If that isn't
followed at some point by an IRQ enable then interrupts will remain disabled
until we return to userspace.
It is true that when switch_mm() is called from the scheduler IRQs are off, but
not when it's called by use_mm(). Looking closer we see that last year in commit
f98db6013c55 ("sched/core: Add switch_mm_irqs_off() and use it in the scheduler")
this was made more explicit by the addition of switch_mm_irqs_off() which is now
called by the scheduler, vs switch_mm() which is used by use_mm().
Arguably it is a bug in use_mm() to call switch_mm() in a different context than
it expects, but fixing that will take time.
This was discovered recently when vhost started throwing warnings such as:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:578
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 10768, name: vhost-10760
no locks held by vhost-10760/10768.
irq event stamp: 10
hardirqs last enabled at (9): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x40/0x80
hardirqs last disabled at (10): switch_slb+0x2e4/0x490
softirqs last enabled at (0): copy_process+0x5e8/0x1260
softirqs last disabled at (0): (null)
Call Trace:
show_stack+0x88/0x390 (unreliable)
dump_stack+0x30/0x44
__might_sleep+0x1c4/0x2d0
mutex_lock_nested+0x74/0x5c0
cgroup_attach_task_all+0x5c/0x180
vhost_attach_cgroups_work+0x58/0x80 [vhost]
vhost_worker+0x24c/0x3d0 [vhost]
kthread+0xec/0x100
ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0xd4
Prior to commit 04b96e5528ca ("vhost: lockless enqueuing") (Aug 2016) the
vhost_worker() would do a spin_unlock_irq() not long after calling use_mm(),
which had the effect of reenabling IRQs. Since that commit removed the locking
in vhost_worker() the body of the vhost_worker() loop now runs with interrupts
off causing the warnings.
This patch addresses the problem by making the powerpc code mirror the x86 code,
ie. we disable interrupts in switch_mm(), and optimise the scheduler case by
defining switch_mm_irqs_off().
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
[mpe: Flesh out/rewrite change log, add stable]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 17 +++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -70,8 +70,9 @@ extern void drop_cop(unsigned long acop,
* switch_mm is the entry point called from the architecture independent
* code in kernel/sched/core.c
*/
-static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
- struct task_struct *tsk)
+static inline void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev,
+ struct mm_struct *next,
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
{
/* Mark this context has been used on the new CPU */
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(next)))
@@ -110,6 +111,18 @@ static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_s
switch_mmu_context(prev, next, tsk);
}
+static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ switch_mm_irqs_off(prev, next, tsk);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+#define switch_mm_irqs_off switch_mm_irqs_off
+
+
#define deactivate_mm(tsk,mm) do { } while (0)
/*
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from david@gibson.dropbear.id.au are
queue-4.9/powerpc-mm-ensure-irqs-are-off-in-switch_mm.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-05-23 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149555093711817@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.