All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rbd: implement REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 17:08:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495552107-1237-1-git-send-email-idryomov@gmail.com> (raw)

Commit 93c1defedcae ("rbd: remove the discard_zeroes_data flag")
explicitly didn't implement REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES for rbd, while the
following commit 48920ff2a5a9 ("block: remove the discard_zeroes_data
flag") dropped ->discard_zeroes_data in favor of REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES.

rbd does support efficient zeroing via CEPH_OSD_OP_ZERO opcode and will
release either some or all blocks depending on whether the zeroing
request is rbd_obj_bytes() aligned.  This is how we currently implement
discards, so REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES can be identical to REQ_OP_DISCARD for
now.  Caveats:

- REQ_NOUNMAP is ignored, but AFAICT that's true of at least two other
  current implementations - nvme and loop

- there is no ->write_zeroes_alignment and blk_bio_write_zeroes_split()
  is hence less helpful than blk_bio_discard_split(), but this can (and
  should) be fixed on the rbd side

In the future we will split these into two code paths to respect
REQ_NOUNMAP on zeroout and save on zeroing blocks that couldn't be
released on discard.

Fixes: 93c1defedcae ("rbd: remove the discard_zeroes_data flag")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index 454bf9c34882..c16f74547804 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -4023,6 +4023,7 @@ static void rbd_queue_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	switch (req_op(rq)) {
 	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
+	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
 		op_type = OBJ_OP_DISCARD;
 		break;
 	case REQ_OP_WRITE:
@@ -4420,6 +4421,7 @@ static int rbd_init_disk(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
 	q->limits.discard_granularity = segment_size;
 	q->limits.discard_alignment = segment_size;
 	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, segment_size / SECTOR_SIZE);
+	blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, segment_size / SECTOR_SIZE);
 
 	if (!ceph_test_opt(rbd_dev->rbd_client->client, NOCRC))
 		q->backing_dev_info->capabilities |= BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES;
-- 
2.4.3


             reply	other threads:[~2017-05-23 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-23 15:08 Ilya Dryomov [this message]
2017-05-23 18:28 ` [PATCH] rbd: implement REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES Jason Dillaman
2017-05-24 11:38   ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2017-05-24 11:53     ` Jason Dillaman
2017-05-24 17:38       ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2017-05-24 19:34         ` Jason Dillaman
2017-05-29  8:39 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-05-29  8:43 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1495552107-1237-1-git-send-email-idryomov@gmail.com \
    --to=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.