From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 98A20E00B2E; Wed, 24 May 2017 07:38:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [134.134.136.31 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A12BE00B27 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 07:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 May 2017 07:38:17 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,386,1491289200"; d="scan'208";a="91260596" Received: from lsandov1-mobl2.zpn.intel.com ([10.219.128.119]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 May 2017 07:38:16 -0700 Message-ID: <1495637202.4956.26.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Leonardo Sandoval To: Gary Thomas Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 09:46:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1c18599c-5bf5-d382-0bba-fc7cebb4b2ce@mlbassoc.com> References: <1c18599c-5bf5-d382-0bba-fc7cebb4b2ce@mlbassoc.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: webkitgtk2 progress bar X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 14:38:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 16:23 +0200, Gary Thomas wrote: > I see that the latest master update has brought a progress bar > for this (and presumably other 'cmake' based packages) - very nice :-) > > Now [tongue-in-cheek], can someone do something about the horrendous > build times for such packages (webkitgtk2 can take up to 3 hours on > my [no so slow] build host!)? this is not easy and from my side what I have done some profiling based on the buildstats to figure out the top consumers recipes/tasks. As you mentioned, webkitgtk is the winner, at least for utimes! https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/MortyBuildstats https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/TipsAndTricks/InvestigatingBuildTime Leo > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------