From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <1495727974.20270.48.camel@redhat.com>
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 11:59:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8537bt9bvj.fsf@boum.org>
References: 
	<CAFwXZv_b3hdEA4xOFKqAVfc4UZEBX=dL9DOY_mDHExsW+Qg6tQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <85inkpie9o.fsf@boum.org> <1495724872.20270.46.camel@redhat.com>
	 <8537bt9bvj.fsf@boum.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wnWFhyVKNEXRG+GQ0sVo"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Patch for random mac address
To: intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
List-ID: <kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com>


--=-wnWFhyVKNEXRG+GQ0sVo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 17:47 +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Rik van Riel:
> > That suggests maybe this kind of functionality should
> > be implemented in userspace, instead?
> > Maybe in NetworkManager, [=E2=80=A6]
>=20
> It's already implemented in NetworkManager :)

So this kernel patch does not solve any problem,
because the solution has already been implemented
in userspace?

--=20
All rights reversed
--=-wnWFhyVKNEXRG+GQ0sVo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAABCAAGBQJZJv9nAAoJEM553pKExN6DYmAH/0mGckhCO32vEPUS9UB0tkpa
7kLfUZM0aymm/pO6xH3JXWXbGCPD9/35DWL7wC0if3d7A9o/7Zzd9tZ8byLVrBtD
cH8LxXBEl8Phpgw+8KQwOoo+3vdv9eBRdlgwRlAhCXPX2CkELKyAyPH33qE8oKXl
CTOi5Rgo1Osm1Lkv0BrvpFGcxn/dGQOhXzhBdyz539uILNGv15s69FkMkhSQGowr
715AQHIsvBXSq4C/l85pUxF1wwtQkUjejOjntps21vFOwNzzX70ScR6eWfvyMA3N
+w3Afipqjk2ojjN7vKneFIL95RY81DtoE8UEqu5prMWjzg65QzHDF25hUT4dDTU=
=U5vs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-wnWFhyVKNEXRG+GQ0sVo--