All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: fix queue quiescing
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 17:59:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495735177.2615.3.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cdfae246-d65e-fc49-69ec-dffe63832605@fb.com>

On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 11:42 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Why not make it
>=20
> 	/* Must be the last member - see also blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(). */
> 	struct srcu_struct	queue_rq_srcu[0];
>=20
> and fixup blk_mq_hw_ctx_size()
>=20
> static int blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(struct request_queue *q)
> {
> 	int size =3D sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx);
>=20
> 	if (q->tag_set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
> 		size +=3D sizeof(struct srcu_struct);
>=20
> 	return size;
> }
>=20
> I think that'd be cleaner. Keep the end-of-struct checking, just to be
> on the safe side.
>=20
> Neither one is super pretty though, and still doesn't fix the fact that
> the srcu_struct is _half_ the blk_mq_hw_ctx in total.

Hello Jens,

Making these changes seems like a good idea to me. I will make these change=
s
and post a patch.

Bart.=

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-25 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-25  4:21 [PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: fix queue quiescing Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_unquiesce_queue Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] block: introduce flag of QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] dm: use the introduced blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 4/7] nvme: " Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi: " Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 6/7] blk-mq: quiesce queue via percpu_ref Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: update comments on blk_mq_quiesce_queue() Ming Lei
2017-05-25  5:24 ` [PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: fix queue quiescing Bart Van Assche
2017-05-25  9:09   ` Ming Lei
2017-05-25 17:24     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-25 17:31       ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-25 17:42       ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-25 17:59         ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-05-26  0:44         ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1495735177.2615.3.camel@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.