From: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@nxp.com>
To: "fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] tick/nohz: schedule TIMER_SOFTIRQ immediately for expired timers
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 18:04:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495821856.7100.4.camel@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170526125517.GA29833@lerouge>
On Vi, 2017-05-26 at 14:55 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 03:39:24PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> >
> > Currently, when detecting expired timers in
> > tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick
> > we just schedule a new hrtimer and let its handler to schedule
> > TIMER_SOFITRQ.
> >
> > This can lead to indefinite timer stalls if the system is busy with
> > a
> > stream of interrupts that have the period shorter or about the same
> > with the value of the minimum delay of the current clocksource
> > driver:
> >
> > -> idle
> > -> IRQ (time = x)
> > -> irq_exit -> tick_nohz_irq_exit -> tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick
> > -> tick_nohz_restart
> > -> cancel hrtimer (set clocksource event to x + max_delay)
> > -> set clocksource to x + min_delay
> > ...
> > -> IRQ (time = y, where y < x + min_delay)
> > -> irq_exit -> tick_nohz_irq_exit -> tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick
> > -> tick_nohz_restart
> > -> cancel hrtimer (set clocksource event to x + max_delay)
> > -> set clocksource to y + min_delay
> >
> > So, instead of prodding the hrtimer interrupt, schedule
> > TIMER_SOFTIRQ
> > since we know that timers are ready. The timers will run either at
> > the
> > next interrupt or from ksoftirq so no hrtimer interrupt is
> > needed. This also avoids spurious programming of the clocksource in
> > this scenario.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > index 3bcb61b..0a30278 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -727,9 +727,16 @@ static ktime_t
> > tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts,
> > *
> > * Only once we exit the idle loop will we re-
> > enable the tick,
> > * see tick_nohz_idle_exit().
> > + *
> > + * Also, make sure we schedule TIMER_SOFTIRQ now
> > instead of
> > + * relying on the hrtimer interrupt to do it to
> > avoid
> > + * postponing processing of expired timers. If we
> > have a
> > + * constant stream of interrupts with a period
> > shorter than
> > + * the minimum delay of the current clocksource we
> > can end up
> > + * postponing the timers indefinitely.
> > */
> > if (delta == 0) {
> > - tick_nohz_restart(ts, now);
> > + raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
> > goto out;
> > }
> > }
> Nice catch! And the patch should work but that actually restores a
> behaviour we've
> removed some time ago. We wanted to get rid of that softirq raise.
>
> So discussing this with Thomas, here is an alternate solution. That
> tick restart looks
> like an unnecessary special case. In fact the normal path ending with
> hrtimer_start()
> in tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() should work if the delta deadline is
> 0. And if
> we do so, we benefit from the optimization path:
>
> if (ts->tick_stopped && (expires == dev->next_event))
>
> ...which avoids the cancel/reprog game and therefore should fix that
> issue.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index ed18ca5..58c257c 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -713,8 +713,6 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct
> tick_sched *ts,
> */
> delta = next_tick - basemono;
> if (delta <= (u64)TICK_NSEC) {
> - tick = 0;
> -
> /*
> * Tell the timer code that the base is not idle,
> i.e. undo
> * the effect of get_next_timer_interrupt():
> @@ -724,23 +722,8 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct
> tick_sched *ts,
> * We've not stopped the tick yet, and there's a
> timer in the
> * next period, so no point in stopping it either,
> bail.
> */
> - if (!ts->tick_stopped)
> - goto out;
> -
> - /*
> - * If, OTOH, we did stop it, but there's a pending
> (expired)
> - * timer reprogram the timer hardware to fire now.
> - *
> - * We will not restart the tick proper, just prod
> the timer
> - * hardware into firing an interrupt to process the
> pending
> - * timers. Just like tick_irq_exit() will not
> restart the tick
> - * for 'normal' interrupts.
> - *
> - * Only once we exit the idle loop will we re-enable
> the tick,
> - * see tick_nohz_idle_exit().
> - */
> - if (delta == 0) {
> - tick_nohz_restart(ts, now);
> + if (!ts->tick_stopped) {
> + tick = 0;
> goto out;
> }
> }
>
Nice, it is less expensive and deletes some code :-) Thanks for the
quick fix Frederic, I confirm it solves my issue.
Tested-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@nxp.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-26 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-24 12:39 [RFC] tick/nohz: schedule TIMER_SOFTIRQ immediately for expired timers Octavian Purdila
2017-05-26 12:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-05-26 18:04 ` Octavian Purdila [this message]
2017-05-30 21:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-31 3:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-05-31 3:08 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1495821856.7100.4.camel@nxp.com \
--to=octavian.purdila@nxp.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.