diff for duplicates of <1496853349.18628.35.camel@synopsys.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 55e9e04..aa7e4b6 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Hi Vineet, -On Wed, 2017-06-07@09:33 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: +On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 09:33 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 05/25/2017 10:24 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > > > Thinking of a toolchains for ARCompact and ARCv2 ISAs we implicitly @@ -21,13 +21,13 @@ On Wed, 2017-06-07@09:33 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > For example OpenEmbedded prefers to reuse the same toolchain for both > > arches having libgcc built separately. > -> So this is a goodness of OE. But unfortunately those of living with simpler build? +> So this is a goodness of OE. But unfortunately those of living with simpler build > systems: Synopsys toolchain scripts or even Buildroot don't have this - right ? > -> So how will it help other developers avoid errors in the work flow when doing? +> So how will it help other developers avoid errors in the work flow when doing > kernel builds for ARCompact and ARCv2. > -> The right solution is to kill off the libgcc dependency altogether form kernel.? +> The right solution is to kill off the libgcc dependency altogether form kernel. > Just import math emulation code that we think is needed and build it in kernel ! Right and that's on my todo list as I'm suffering the most from this issue now :) diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 72830b0..e9b3d68 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,14 +1,16 @@ "ref\01495733045-18736-1-git-send-email-abrodkin@synopsys.com\0" "ref\009e88740-9aa5-0526-abc3-9374fc9af5e9@synopsys.com\0" - "From\0Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com (Alexey Brodkin)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH] arc: Remove sometimes misleading toolchain check\0" + "From\0Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] arc: Remove sometimes misleading toolchain check\0" "Date\0Wed, 7 Jun 2017 16:35:50 +0000\0" - "To\0linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>" + " linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>\0" + "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Vineet,\n" "\n" - "On Wed, 2017-06-07@09:33 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:\n" + "On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 09:33 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:\n" "> On 05/25/2017 10:24 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:\n" "> > \n" "> > Thinking of a toolchains for ARCompact and ARCv2 ISAs we implicitly\n" @@ -29,17 +31,17 @@ "> > For example OpenEmbedded prefers to reuse the same toolchain for both\n" "> > arches having libgcc built separately.\n" "> \n" - "> So this is a goodness of OE. But unfortunately those of living with simpler build?\n" + "> So this is a goodness of OE. But unfortunately those of living with simpler build\302\240\n" "> systems: Synopsys toolchain scripts or even Buildroot don't have this - right ?\n" "> \n" - "> So how will it help other developers avoid errors in the work flow when doing?\n" + "> So how will it help other developers avoid errors in the work flow when doing\302\240\n" "> kernel builds for ARCompact and ARCv2.\n" "> \n" - "> The right solution is to kill off the libgcc dependency altogether form kernel.?\n" + "> The right solution is to kill off the libgcc dependency altogether form kernel.\302\240\n" "> Just import math emulation code that we think is needed and build it in kernel !\n" "\n" "Right and that's on my todo list as I'm suffering the most from this issue now :)\n" "\n" -Alexey -4fc21f280341d986d9f11d4a6a5d45bae5b53186fbfd64b50da788857567ae19 +2506fa7c3fee2df4bc3ed0b0e4ca10d978b9ba96ef472cefa10826a9b0f187c3
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.