All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Cc: "openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org"
	<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: -pie in SECURITY_CFLAGS (was: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] meson: update Meson devtool to 0.40.1)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 10:43:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496997797.30163.181.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8806ffa9be8f4516b3f29cc1be0ceaf3@XBOX02.axis.com>

On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 21:44 +0000, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> My guess is that the problem stems from the fact that security_flags.inc 
> adds -pie (which is a linker flag) to SECURITY_CFLAGS rather than 
> SECURITY_LDFLAGS...

I think I've seen that cause problems elsewhere when the CFLAGS came
after -shared, because then the compiler ended up trying to produce a
pie executable instead of a shared library.

Perhaps we should finally address that in security_flags.inc instead of
working around it?

Here's an untested patch which puts -pie where it belongs in the final
variables, without changing the pie/no pie API:

diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
index e162abeb3d9..b7b19355806 100644
--- a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ lcl_maybe_fortify = "${@base_conditional('DEBUG_BUILD','1','','-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE
 # Error on use of format strings that represent possible security problems
 SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT ?= "-Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security"
 
+# For history reasons and simplicity, -pie is listed here as part of CFLAGS.
+# In practice, it ends up getting used as part of LDFLAGS, as it should
+# be because it is a linker flag.
 SECURITY_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-strong -pie -fpie ${lcl_maybe_fortify} ${SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT}"
 SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-strong ${lcl_maybe_fortify} ${SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT}"
 
@@ -94,8 +97,8 @@ SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT_pn-busybox = ""
 SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT_pn-gcc = ""
 SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT_pn-oh-puzzles = ""
 
-TARGET_CFLAGS_append_class-target = " ${SECURITY_CFLAGS}"
-TARGET_LDFLAGS_append_class-target = " ${SECURITY_LDFLAGS}"
+TARGET_CFLAGS_append_class-target = " ${@ oe.utils.filter_out('-pie', '${SECURITY_CFLAGS}') }"
+TARGET_LDFLAGS_append_class-target = " ${@ oe.utils.filter('-pie', '${SECURITY_CFLAGS}') } ${SECURITY_LDFLAGS}"
 
 SECURITY_LDFLAGS_remove_pn-gcc-runtime = "-fstack-protector-strong"
 SECURITY_LDFLAGS_remove_pn-glibc = "-fstack-protector-strong"

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.





  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-09  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-05 17:23 [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] meson: update Meson devtool to 0.40.1 Adam C. Foltzer
2017-06-05 17:23 ` [meta-oe][PATCH 2/3] meson: fix build/host confusion for bbclass Adam C. Foltzer
2017-06-16 11:19   ` Linus Svensson
2017-06-26 13:07     ` Burton, Ross
2017-06-05 17:23 ` [meta-oe][PATCH 3/3] meson: add LDFLAGS to bbclass C/C++ link arguments Adam C. Foltzer
2017-06-07 21:48   ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2017-06-08 17:34     ` [meta-oe][PATCH v2] meson: add LDFLAGS to bbclass C/C++ link Adam C. Foltzer
2017-06-08 17:34       ` [meta-oe][PATCH v2] meson: add LDFLAGS to bbclass C/C++ link arguments Adam C. Foltzer
2017-06-08 17:44         ` Khem Raj
2017-06-08 17:50           ` Adam Foltzer
2017-06-26 12:58         ` Burton, Ross
2017-06-07 21:44 ` [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] meson: update Meson devtool to 0.40.1 Peter Kjellerstedt
2017-06-09  8:43   ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
2017-06-09 13:24     ` -pie in SECURITY_CFLAGS (was: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] meson: update Meson devtool to 0.40.1) Khem Raj
2017-06-09 14:34       ` Patrick Ohly
2017-06-09 17:32         ` Patrick Ohly
2017-06-12  7:04           ` Patrick Ohly
2017-06-12 14:47             ` Khem Raj
2017-06-12 18:23               ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2017-06-12 18:50                 ` Khem Raj
2017-06-08 19:47 ` [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] meson: update Meson devtool to 0.40.1 Martin Jansa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1496997797.30163.181.camel@intel.com \
    --to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.