From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1497209974.22624.118.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] iio: accel: mma9551: use NULL for GPIO connection ID From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linus Walleij , Jonathan Cameron , Mika Westerberg Cc: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 22:39:34 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <20170610185841.49911-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20170611114610.62fac902@kernel.org> <1497191154.22624.107.camel@linux.intel.com> <20170611160802.788b098c@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-ID: On Sun, 2017-06-11 at 19:45 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Jonathan Cameron > wrote: > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > I think the best is to read a documentation portion patch from > > > here: > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio. > > > git/co > > > mmit/?h=for-next&id=ed7fcf1ed5ea4ea01243995ae085757a77cf0f3e > > > > Cool. I think I follow what is going on now. > > > > We don't need the string and it just makes life nasty for ACPI. Fair > > enough.  Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git with that link > > added > > and pushed out as testing for the autobuilders to play with it. > > > > Still time if Linus want's to add anything. > > It's fine. I have a very high level of trust about Andy's patches and > I > know he's always doing his best to make ACPI play well with GPIO. > AFICT this is the best thing to do, but honestly, I see Andy and > Mika Westerberg as the true GPIO-ACPI maintainers. > By the way, we may add ourselves (still need Mika's Ack on this) to a separate record in MAINTEINERS. It might make your burden less heavy. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy